The correct answer of the given question above would be option D. The correct description of one of the ways in which a command economy differs from a market economy is that, in a command economy, individuals have less economic freedom. Hope this answer helps.
In order for world hunger to change for the better, everyone would have to be completely selfless and willing to give some to help those who have none. If those who have more than they need can give some of their food or money to people who live in poverty, there would be enough to go around. In America and other places like it, food is in such excess that we waste vast quantities of it every single day, simply because we can't eat or sell it all! If even half of that food was shared, not only would the issue of hunger be eliminated, but the waste problem too! I can help achieve this by sharing the excess that I have with others. I could donate food, money, or my time to a charity, or even just bring food to the homeless. It isn't hard to help!
The historical context of this passage is that people in large cities and rural villages had different opinions about how people should choose marriage partners, as option C shows.
<h3>What is a historical context?</h3>
- It is a concept that is based on a period in the past.
- It is a way of showing how society behaved in the past.
In the text shown above, we can see that the two characters disagree on how marriages should happen and how people should relate to each other. This is because these two characters grew up in different environments, which had strict social groups. This is a strong feature of society in the past.
Your question is incomplete. The complete question is in the attached images.
Learn more about "Marriage Is a Private Affair":
brainly.com/question/1603337
#SPJ1
Answer:
the action of clearing a wide area of trees.
Explanation:
