Answer:
D but read below.
Explanation:
I think it is D.
The problem is that none of the others, good as they are, do not summarize what actions were taken.
D doesn't really either. What it summarizes is that some of their actions had international implications.
C talks about the nature of the people, not the effect of their actions.
B talks about what was there that they had to fight against. It is wonderful to know that that was what motivated them to be who they were, but it does not answer the question.
A goes along with B. It was an incident that showed what was there. It does not fully answer the question.
This is a very difficult question to answer because none talk about what really happened that made their actions international. I am in awe of what they did and said and what they thought, but only D says what the effect was.
I can be wrong, but I'd still stick with D. If you get it wrong, you can claim it is a poor question (which it is). But I wouldn't push it.
Content analysis. Content analysis is a research method for studying documents and communication artifacts, which might be texts of various formats, pictures, audio or video. Social scientists use content analysis to examine patterns in communication in a replicable and systematic manner.
As used as well, they use it to analyzed the arguments. Just like Social scientists can.
Answer:
A: a story that seems believable but has not been proven true
Explanation:
