The speed and accleration of a car travelling in reverse and in the normal direction is the same. Therefore the measurement of its speed is still done using the metric system or via miles per hour (mph).
Answer:
If your options are:
A. The poem uses variations of meter to affect rhyme.
B. The poem’s sentences flow across stanzas.
C. The poem’s stanzas have varying lengths.
D. The poem uses nontraditional syntax and rhyme scheme.
Then the answer is D.
Explanation:
The nontraditional syntax is best shown in the use of enjambment - interrupting the thought and syntactic structure in the middle and moving the rest to the next line. For example: "and older than the // flow of human blood (...)"
Here, the definite article "the" has been separated from the noun "flow", which means the phrase is visually broken in half.
- A isn't true because this poem conveys its meaning through rhythm and not rhyme. There are virtually no rhymes here and the syntax (sentence structure) is disrupted, invoking the sound of a river flowing in irregular but consistent waves.
- B isn't true because the sentences do flow across lines but not across stanzas.
- The stanzas do have varying lengths. But even though this element was pretty rare prior to the 20th century, it is not exclusive to modernist poetry. That's why C isn't true either.
Answer: deception, naivete, youthful innocence, and appearances versus reality.
The Answer would be "The variety in nature"
Answer:
A context in which I would use informal English to communicate would be with my friends or my family group, that is, in a non-academic environment where the idiomatic expressions used to communicate are those of common speech, with a flat and non-specific language, and lacking of formalities or hierarchical structures within the syntax.
Thus, informal language avoids the use of unusual idioms, given the relative familiarity between the sender and receiver of the message.
