Tensions between Japan and the United States grew in the late 1930s as a result of Japan's continued expansion into China and its joining of the Axis.
<h3>Why did Japan and the United States become tense in the late 1930s?</h3>
When the Japanese bombed the USS Panay as it was transporting American citizens out of Nanjing, tensions with Japan grew. Attack by Japan on China led to disagreements between Japan and the US in the late 1930s.
Therefore, we can conclude that the events that led to rising tensions between Japan and the United States in the late 1930s were Japan's continued expansion into China.
Therefore, options B and D are correct.
Learn more about the Japan, refer to:
brainly.com/question/24202081
#SPJ1
The Embargo Act of 1807 was Jefferson's attempt to keep the country at peace and avoid further provocative incidents. It also stopped the export of American goods <span>and prohibited all U.S. ships from leaving for foreign ports. And it was denounced by New England merchants and western and southern farmers alike, therefore all of the above is the correct answer!</span>
The answer is B. I think.
Answer: C.
The discovery of the mummies in Xinjiang sparked debate because they appeared Caucasian in origin.
Explanation:
A collection of ancient mummies were discovered during the 1900s in Xinjiang, China. The mummies were called the Tarim mummies.
There has been a lot of debate caused by the origin of these mummies.
Physical evidence and DNA have shown that the mummies were not Chinese but had both European and Asian features meaning they were of Indo-European origin.
Answer:
Explanation:
D is likely the only one that you can get rid of immediately. It benefits you. It does not benefit the society in general.
A is subtly the same thing as D. If you make the economy grow, the first individual who will benefit from it is you. That statement is up for argument, because you could contribute to economic growth without benefitting yourself, but there are better answers.
C The founding fathers would mildly disagree with you. They saw the need for government strength but not at the cost of individual rights. Again you could argue this as civic duty, but there is a better answer.
B The answer is B. The "common good" does not need to involve money or government. It is simply doing what is right for everyone.
