Explanation:
here is an explanation and solution to your question
For Euphoria:
The opportunity cost of producing a unit of rye in terms of jeans =20/5 = 4
for contente:
The opportunity cost of producing a unit of rye in terms of jeans = 16/8 = 2
opportunity cost of producing 1 unit of jean in terms of unit of rye:
for euphoria = 5/20 = 1/4
for contente = 8/16 = 1/2
1.
Euphoria's opportunity cost of producing a a bushel of rye is 4 pairs of jeans.
contentes opportunity cost of producing a bushel of rye is 2 pairs of jeans.
2.
contente has comparative advantage in producing rye
euphoria has comparative advantage in jeans production
3
contente produces 8 bushels of rye so with 4 million hours of labor = 8x4 = 32 million bushels in a week.
euphoria 20 pairs of jean in a week, using 4 million hours of labor. 20x4 = 80 pairs of jean a week
Is this argumentative ? are you supposed to be talking her into donating ? you could say that there’s proof that they do donate the money and use self worth and helping others and the good feeling you get from that to get her to donate
I would say this impression, would cause her to act negatively towards her.
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
In a given situation like the one presented in the question, it is believed and expected that three topics in which the Human Resources specialist in the area of the cybersecurity program, would emphasize in the presentation to draw students to this field are the following:
1. It has a high earning potential
2. it is a career field in high demand
3. It is a service to humanity
