Yes definitely depends on that
Answer: Yes they did.
Explanation:
Apparent Authority refers to a scenario where a Agent is assumed to have the power to act on behalf of a Principal regardless of if said authority had not being expressly given whether implicitly or otherwise.
It is worthy of note that this power is only valid if the third party in the transaction assumes from the conduct of the agent, that they have such powers to act.
It is stated in the text that there was no question that the brokers had the actual or implied authority to sell the stock meaning that the Principal had not done enough to show that the agents did not have the Authority to act as they did. For this reason, they can indeed be sued under the Principle of Apparent Authority.
Answer:
Issued shares =5000
Outstanding shares = 4700
Explanation:
Jan-1 Issued shares = 2000 shares
During year 3000 shares were issued.
a.) Outstanding shares =?
we know that Outstanding shares = issued stock -repurchased shares- treasury stock
= 2000+3000-500+200
= 4700 shares.
b.) Shares of common stock issued=?
Number of issued shares = 2000+3000 = 5000 shares.
Number of outstanding shares will always be less than issued shares.
All of them it was a really hard time
Answer:
$66,700
b. LIFO = $70800
67807.81
Explanation:
LIFO means last in first out. It means that it is the last purchased inventory that is the first to be sold.
(8130 x 8) + [(9090 - 8130) x 6) = 70800
FIFO means first in, first out. It means that it is the first purchased inventory that is the first to be sold
(3010 x 6) + [(9090 - 3010) x $8] = 66,700
Average cost = [(3010 x 6) + (8130 x 8)] /
18060
48640
b 65040
5760
