The House of Representatives, as the name states, is meant to represent the population of the United States. Therefore, this is only effective if it actually includes most groups in society. This can be achieved if the scale of representation is small and if there is a high turnover.
However, this is not the case nowadays, and this is indeed a problem. A larger scale of representation means people are a lot less likely to be able to voice their opinion to their representatives or influence government in any way. Moreover, the low turnover means that most people cannot hope to become a representative.
The matching of the phrase to their meaning base on judicial system are;
- Judicial restraint: relies heavily on involves strict interpretation.
- judicial activism: courts play active role
- in shaping social policy.
<h3>What is judiciary system?</h3>
judiciary system serves as as as a system that deals with administration of justice in the Court of law.
Judicial activism is a philosophy which says judges can deviate from strict adherence of law while judicial restraint is the opposite.
When a court limits powers to strike down laws (judicial activism) means that there could be a little deviation from handling similar cases that has been handled before.
Learn more about judiciary system at;
brainly.com/question/4937540
#SPJ1
The answer would be California
The protestant revolt did not affect the authority of the Catholic Church.
It has the same authority that it has always had since it was founded by Jesus Christ in 33 AD.
The Catholic Church's authority is from God alone so the actions of individual heretics cannot affect it except in a superficial manner.
Answer: Both approach
Explanation:
This boils down to opinion of the masses as individuals choices differ, as most voters combine both retrospective and prospective approach when selecting their choice candidate. Some judge based on past performance of the candidate; was he successful to handling projects and Co? while others choose based what the candidate is promising to fulfill when they get into office.
Although some persons are more confident on past success of a candidate, some others would love to see changes that come with the new candidate.
