Answer:
actually it wasnt a massacre a massacre by defination was killing people who cant fight back or something like that. The british killed the townspeople who were throwing things like heavy rocks, nails, and lots of sharp an d dangerous things, the british merely had stronger weapons.
Explanation:
The best answer in that set would seem to be "compromise." I'm not sure I'd use exactly that term, but it's the best term from the set of answers given. Count Camillo di Cavour was prime minister of the Kingdom of Sardinia, serving under King Victor Emmanuel II. This was a time in history (in the 19th century) when prime ministers were starting to exercise more control of policy than the kings themselves. It was also a time of something that came to be known a "Realpolitik" (a German term), or "realistic politics." So I'd say Cavour was a political realist who chose paths of action that would benefit his overall aims, whether or not they fit some specific ideology or master plan. I suppose "compromise" would be another way of saying that, but I'd prefer to say he practiced political realism.
Answer:
Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony
Explanation:
Formed in 1890, NAWSA was the result of a merger between two rival factions--the National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) led by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, and the American Woman Suffrage Association (AWSA). These opposing groups were organized in the late 1860s, partly as the result of a disagreement over strategy. NWSA favored women's enfranchisement through a federal constitutional amendment, while AWSA believed success could be more easily achieved through state-by-state campaigns. NAWSA combined both of these techniques, securing the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920 through a series of well-orchestrated state campaigns under the dynamic direction of Carrie Chapman Catt. With NAWSA's primary goal of women's enfranchisement now a reality, the organization was transformed into the League of Women Voters.
30 GBP
Today that is equivalent to 2,592 GBP!
I hope this helps!
The Boston Tea Party was a protest against The Tea Act in 1773, which was an act that helped the East India Company (a British tea company) that had fallen into debt. The act allowed The East India Company to ship its goods directly to its own agents in America without letting the colonist trade the tea. The colonists felt that this was unfair to the merchants and wholesalers who had been selling tea as their trade. The punitive acts that the British Parliament had been enforcing were nicknamed ''The Intolerable Acts'' by the Colonist after they had been punished for protesing for their rights.
