Explanation:
what happen to ur previous account
Answer:
A market for cats would have had a positive externality.
Because the cats would kill the rats on sight since that is their natural behavior.
However, it is interesting to mention, that the cat's killing has been more of a "mythic" aspect of this story, since it fails to take into account that since the black death was caused by the<em> yersinia pestis</em> bacteria, cats could have been also infected, and since their interactions with humans are greater than rats or fleas, the real outcome could have been totally unexpected.
Answer:caretaker, lost, third party, lost, fails, conversion, incentives, abandoned, trespassing, abandoned
Explanation:A person who finds mislaid property does not obtain title to the goods, but rather becomes a __caretaker ________ of those goods.
A person who finds ___lost ___ property must return it to the owner if that person can be found, but has better claim to the property than a ___third party______. If the finder of ____lost ___ property knows the true owner, but ______fails ___ to return the property to him or her, the finder may be guilty of the tort of conversion________ . Estray statutes provide ______incentives ______ for finders to report their discoveries. A person who finds abandoned _____ property becomes the true owner of that property unless he or she finds it while __trespassing _______. A true owner of mislaid or lost property who gives up any further attempt to find has _abandoned ________ the property.
Jeremy's behavior is under pretty tight stimulus control.
Stimulus control refers to the fact that an individual will behave one way when presented with a particular stimulus, and behave completely differently when that stimulus is absent. In Jeremy's case, he avoids any interaction with that German shepherd, but he is not afraid of dogs in general.
Answer:
Near v. Minnesota
Explanation:
In the case of Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court held that, except in the most extraordinary circumstances, the First Amendment prohibits the government from seeking to prevent news outlets from publishing whatever they want.
Near v. Minnesota (1931) is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision which declare every State powerless to restrain by injunction the business of publishing and circulating news, it is the first major ruling concerning freedom of the press that the Court ever decided.
