Answer:
d) overapplied $160
Explanation:
$35,000 expected overhead / 5,000 machine= 7 dollar per machine hour are spend on overhead
<em><u>applied overhead:</u></em>
4,980 x 7 = 34,860
<u><em>actual overehad:</em></u> 34,700
As the amount of cost enter by the accounting are above the real cost, we are going to increase the manufacturing overhead cost and making the net income lower for this particular reason.
Answer: $828
Explanation:
Given the following :
Semi-annual payment = $40
Period = 20 years
Number of payments = (20 * 2)(semiannual) = 40 payments
Par value = $1000
Interest rate = 5%
Using the PV table:
PV at $1 (40, 5%) = 0.1420
PVA at $1 (40, 5%) = 17.159
[Par value * PV at $1 (40, 5%)] + [$40 * PVA at $1 (40, 5%)]
= ($1000 * 0.1420) + ($40 * 17.159)
= $142 + $686.36
=$828.36
= $826
According to the leader-member exchange theory, the individual worker is the situation, and therefore, each dyadic relationship will be somewhat different.
The leader-member exchange theory is a relationship-based approach to leadership theory that suggests leaders and members develop distinctive relationships. These relationships depend on their social give and take. The standard of these exchanges within an organization can heavily influence employee outcomes. This theory emphasizes the two-way relationship between leaders and followers.
The main motive of the leader-member exchange theory is to denote an explanation of the outcomes of leadership on members, organizations, and teams. This theory suggests that leaders do not treat every subordinate in the same way. In return, this treatment of the subordinates by their leader determines their work-related attitudes.
Learn more about Leader-member exchange theory: https://brainly.in/question/9862449
#SPJ4
Over 90 percent of the pedestrian fatalities occurred in single- vehicle crashes. In 2009, pedestrian deaths accounted for 12 percent of all traffic fatalities in motor vehicle traffic crashes. Since 2000, the number of pedestrian fatalities has decreased by 14 percent.
Answer:
3. No, due to unilateral mistake
Explanation:
Lacey and Cagney both had agreed to wok for 30 hours per week and the agreement is in written format since it is enforceable. Both of them are sharing 50% profits so both will have to share the duties equally. When Lacey makes an excuse and is working for 20 hours per week only Cagney can sues her and she is in a probability to win against her. Lacey should have informed Cagney about the vacation from school scenario before signing the contract.
