Answer:
I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.
Explanation:
I value there loyalty ,honesty and being able to understand their Point of view.I think loyalty and honesty help make the relationship healthy and trustworthy. But being able to understand her point of you causes less conflict and arguments because they they care about your point of I think loyalty and honesty help make the relationship healthy and trustworthy. But being able to understand her point of view causes less conflict and arguments because they care about your opinion.
Answer:
Explanation:
A boycott is when a group of people rebel against the government because they don’t like how they are being treated or how things are managed
Answer:
B. Salutary neglect
Explanation:
Salutary neglect is the policy by the British whereby strict enforcement of parliamentary laws, especially trade laws, meant to keep British colonies obedient to England, in the 18th century are avoided. It is non-deliberate policy.
a central data hub for a "smart"city
