1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kumpel [21]
3 years ago
12

What qualification is needed for a successful candidate to be a naturalized citizen

History
1 answer:
kari74 [83]3 years ago
4 0
Hello there! in the United States the qualification to be a successful naturalized citizen is Be at least 18 years of age. Be a lawful permanent resident, which means you have a green card. Have lived in the United States as a lawful green card holder for at least 5 years. Have been physically present in the United States for at least 30 months during the 5 years after becoming a legal permanent resident.
You might be interested in
At what battle did William Travis call on Americans and other free people to support the Texas cause? PLEASE HELP?!?!
aev [14]
Anahuac is the name of the area the battle took place although i dont know the real name but judging by the way most battles are named i think it would be the battle of anahuac
4 0
3 years ago
Partisanship in Congress during the Clinton presidency made it very difficult to
tekilochka [14]
“””””””””compromise-100%
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Calhoun, all of the following were pro-slavery arguments except
Sav [38]
<span>a.
Before slavery, Blacks were uncivilized.  Hope this helps!:)</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Did the supreme court decisions under john marshall's leadership extend federal power too much? is it appropriate that someone w
mash [69]

The supreme court decision under John Marshall leadership have extended federal powers, but not too much in the sense of destroying the federalist idea that brought the United States together. Marshall was guided by a strong commitment to judicial power and by a belief in the supremacy of national over state legislatures. His judicial vision was very much in keeping with the Federalist political program in line with the constitution.

It can be argued that someone not elected should not have power to shape government and law through the Expansion of the Judiciary in 1801, but the Marshall Court, and this decision in particular, established the principle of "judicial review" whereby Congressional laws and executive actions may be judged by the Supreme Court to be within the bounds of the Constitution.

It is definitely not appropriate that a political party ideology is implemented through the judiciary, however, In keeping with John Marshall's Federalist views, they generally favored strong government action and especially supported the supremacy of the federal government over state authorities as long as it was constitutional.

7 0
4 years ago
Why did you choose<br> How did slaves resist the system of slavery as your topic helpp
Reika [66]

Africans resisted, or rebelled, against their position as slaves

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLLLLLZZZZZZZZZ HEEEEEEEEELLLLLLPPPPPPP MEEEEEEEEEEEEE
    15·1 answer
  • What was the central goal of the National Organization for Women (NOW)?
    13·1 answer
  • Why is legal equality important to the free enterprise system?
    6·2 answers
  • A_________is a formal charge in a federal case by a grand jury.
    12·2 answers
  • WHAT IS ONE WAY THAT PARTRICIANS HAD MORE POWER THAN PLEBEIANS.
    5·1 answer
  • How are the executive powers divided in state governments?
    13·2 answers
  • Describe how bacteria are different from animals. Try to come up with at least three differences.
    13·1 answer
  • In a racially divided America, what did the Tuskegee airmen<br> prove?
    11·1 answer
  • Summarize the United States' relationship with<br> China during the late 1800's.
    13·1 answer
  • What is the answer to this question
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!