Answer:
American solders coming back home from war faced the consequences of media and propaganda broadcasting what happened during the war. After witnessing the horrors media was portraying about the War, such as soldiers unnecessarily killing children and women in cold blood, many Americans became "anti-war" and manifested their opinions very strongly to the point of calling the soldiers "baby killers." So, when said soldiers came back home, they were seen as monsters who would commit atrocities against people who had nothing to do with the war.
Whast are u aasking any more details ]
Answer:
The Strasbourg massacre happened when hundred Jews publicly burnt to death as part of the Black Death persecutions.
Explanation:
The destruction of the Jewish community in Strasbourg happened when they accused of starting the plague in Europe during the medieval period. Jews burned in public from the Mediterranean to Germany. The massacre occurred in 1349 when Jews burned and expelled from cities. The possibilities of the thousand of Jews death was their prosperity and religion (Judaism) which differed from Christianity. They were among the wealthy community in Europe who became merchants and carried commodities that were in high demand, including spices, silk, perfumes, and jewellery. In some parts of Christian Europe, Jews excluded from having land that led them to enter into certain occupations like commercial and economic endeavours.
Answer:
Legally, representatives of the Electoral College have the right to vote as they like and for whom they want, ignoring the results of popular vote in their states. State governments, for their part, have the power to impose monetary fines and, in some states, to revoke such votes. The general situation was clarified by the Supreme Court in 1954 in the ruling in Ray v. Blair. It was clarified that the states and parties to which the electors belong have the right to demand from them a preliminary “pledge to vote” and provide for actions in case of violation of such an oath, but they cannot prosecute electors in the framework of criminal procedure of the Code for breaking such an oath.
Now, the Supreme Court places emphasis on the protection of the popular will, which gives voters the task of voting for the required candidates. If this were not the case and the voters chose with absolute freedom which candidate to vote for, the popular will would be severely impaired and the voters would be practically the only voters who would define the destiny of the federal government.
