Answer:
Check below for the answers and explanations
Explanation:
1) Standing is the process of examining the right of a plaintiff to take a lawsuit to the court of law.
Standing is important to ensure that the case brought to court is actually a dispute and not a contempt from an aggrieved party. It also ensures that the innocent is not unlawfully punished.
2) Sierra Club could have had a standing to file the lawsuit if it had an evidence or a likelihood of being injured or harmed
3) The Sierra club case led to the birth of a dissent that environmental objects should be regarded as persons in ecological matters.
4)The case did not have standing because it was filed by an organization and this conflicts with the Animal Welfare Act which stated that individuals and organizations do not have standing to file a lawsuit in a court.
5) Mr Jurnove, a worker of the Animal Legal Defence Fund was able to provide a substantial claim of the injuries he suffered when he saw the ill treatment the animals were subjected to by USDA.
Though other plaintiffs do not have standing, as far as one of them does, it will not be considered whether or not the others have standing. Therefore, the plaintiff had standing.
6) None of the plaintiffs that were acting on behalf of the dolphin met the requirement of "Injury in fact", a necessary requirement to have standing. None of them could give evidences of the injuries suffered as a result of the act by The New England Aquarium.
Answer:
It helps improve their credit history and it helps them be able to get one in the future without the hastle.
Explanation:
The reason why it would help their credit history is becasue if they dont intend on using it then they wont be spending money that they dont have so then they wont have to pay it off every month. And getting a creditcard in the first place is pretty difficult becasue they always look at your credit score or history and most of the time when somone applies for a crditcard they dont have a creditscore or history.
Answer:
c. She should tell him that he should have a policy provided to all employees offering to correct any offensive conduct, and that an unreasonable failure by an employee to take advantage of corrective opportunities offered through the policy would help him avoid liability.
Explanation:
This is most likely what Kiera should tell Richard. It is true that employers are generally liable for cases of discrimination and harassment at their own place of business. This is because such cases often indicate a lack of overview and proper management. However, one way to avoid such liability would be by having a policy offered to all employees offering to correct any offensive conduct.
Answer:
Federalism describes the system of shared governance between national and state governments.
Explanation:
Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.
