It would actually be the very poor farmers would would be the group of people would have been most likely to become populists. Many people felt like these people would get no where, but the majority of them were actually the many people would then became populists. Your correct answer would then be the last option: <span>farmers who received little money for their work</span>
You didn't provide options, so let me simply give you a definition of the social contract according to 18th century Enlightenment philosophy:
- The "social contract" refers to an implicit agreement between a government and the citizens of the society overseen by that government.
Philosophers of the Enlightenment era were famous for arguing the idea of a "social contract." According to this view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed. This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler. One of the most influential of the social contract theorists was John Locke, who repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his<em> First Treatise on Civil Government</em>. In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government, </em> Locke then argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting and enhancing their own life, liberty, and property. This also meant that the people could replace a government if it was not serving the people's interests properly. A divine right monarchy resisted any change of rulership because it was seen as interfering with a ruler appointed by God.
<span>
Cultural Revolution, single communist state, economic growth, people can't vote in (free) elections, and Mao Zedong because chairman of the Chinese Communist Party(1930)
</span>
The correct answer is ideas about justice. Charity and ethical
lessons and salvation are not connected to legal systems because they are less
a judicial thing and more of a moral thing. Notions about what is just and what
isn't enthused the legal systems because Christianity was the central set of
ideas for centuries to come.
Answer:
A. Judicial Review
Explanation:
The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.