Answer:
c. 1.6 percent.
Explanation:
GDP Deflator = Nominal GDP / Real GDP * 100
year 1
Real GDP = $2250 billion/72*100
= $ 3125.
year 2
Real GDP = $2508 billion/79*100
= $3175
Real GDP rose by = Real GDP (2nd year) - Real GDP (1st year)
= $3175 - $3125
= $ 50
% increase = $50/$2,250*100
= 1.6%
Therefore, The Real GDP rose by 1.6%.
Answer:
B. Imposed Non Exchange Transactions
Explanation:
A non exchange transaction is a form of transaction whereby a party or a group or an individual receives something of value without directly giving value back in exchange. In non exchange transactions, a party gives value to another without directly receiving approximate value in exchanges. Grants, taxes, special assessments, fines and so on are all parts of non exchange transactions. However, taxes and fines are imposed non exchange transactions because they are assessed and not derived from transactions.
Answer: $32.70
Explanation:
According to the dividend discount model, the value of the stock today is the present value of the dividends to be paid plus the present value of the value of the dividend from when the company starts maintaining a stable growth rate which in this question in year 2.
= (Year 1 Dividend / ( 1 + r)) + (Year 2 Dividend / ( 1 + r)²) + (value at year 2 / ( r - g))
Value at year 2 = Year 3 dividend / ( required return - growth rate)
= ( Year 2 dividend * (1 + g)) / ( required return - growth rate)
= (2.46* ( 1 + 0.039)) / ( 0.113 - 0.039)
= $34.54
Value today = (Year 1 Dividend / ( 1 + r)) + (Year 2 Dividend / ( 1 + r)²) + (value at year 2 / ( r - g))
= 3.15/1.113 + 2.46/1.113² + 34.54/1.113²
= 2.83 + 1.99 + 27.88
= $32.70
Answer:
Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury.
Explanation:
The above question is incomplete as there are several answer options which are listed below;
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury as long as Lexi was in the room when she got
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury
• Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury
• Lexi can hold the manufacturer liable for Jill's injury.
The above answer - Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury, is true according to the rule of privity of contract. The rule states that a person who is not a party to a contract does not have right to sue or be sued and to enforce the obligations arising from the contract, unlike a person who is a party to the contract.
With regards to the above scenario, Lexi, who buys a food processor is the party to the contract here, hence can sue and be sued in case of any injury suffered by her, however, Jill whom food processor was loaned to, is the third party here, hence not covered by the rule of privity of contract.
