1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Darya [45]
3 years ago
15

What is true about details of setting and plot in historical fiction?

History
1 answer:
Olenka [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

They are sometimes factual

Explanation:

The truism about details of setting and plot in historical fiction is that they are factual sometimes.

A historical fiction is a type of writing where the story line happens in the past. One major characteristic is that it is sometimes factual and other times is inaccurate.

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
Dmitrij [34]

Answer:

its d

Explanation:

most oil refineries where on the texas coast bc it was easier to ship by boat the by train or truck

5 0
2 years ago
According to Steffens, what was the purpose of muckraking journalism?
stira [4]
Muckraking journalism involves writing about crime and corruption in government and in industry. A journalist who engage in muckraking journalism is called a muckraker. This type of journalism bring important social issues to light.  According to Steffen, the major purpose of muckraking journalism is to expose and reform corruption in politics. 
4 0
3 years ago
The U.S was tempted to help French fight the communists in this country in the 1950’s.
alexira [117]
The country the U.S. was tempted to help the French in during the 50's was Vietnam
5 0
3 years ago
The<br> was the only true source of religious authority in Lutheranism.<br> Was
frutty [35]

Answer:

the Bible

Ultimate Source of Authority:

Lutherans believed that the Bible was the only true source of religious words and guidance.

8 0
3 years ago
After presenting a reason and evidence in an argumentative essay, a writer should present the conclusion. a counterclaim. an add
Katarina [22]

Answer:

B is your answer.

Explanation:

After giving many examples and reasons, you have to be able to give a rebuttal, aka a counterclaim to show that not only do you know what you're talking about, you can also point out some positives of the other argument and still come out with the reader agreeing with what you have to say.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In dakota society did people belive time runs in straight lines
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not a muckraker during the Progressive Era?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of the Ninth Amendment?
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE ANSWER ASAP 15 POINTS
    10·2 answers
  • Who were father Hidalgo and José Maria Morelos?
    8·1 answer
  • If a president is accused of breaking the twenty second amendment that means the president is tying to
    6·2 answers
  • Who was George Washington
    6·1 answer
  • What contributions did the Spanish give to the cattle boom?
    5·2 answers
  • Defines these words
    10·1 answer
  • Anyone who sees this could help me write a 3 paragraph opinion article about “colonialism and imperialism” ? I need help!!! (Opi
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!