Answer:
This study offers a comparison of the differing architectural styles and forms in the Norman Kingdoms of Sicily and England, exploring what exactly differed, as well as attempting to determine why such differences exist in each area. In the Kingdom of England, the Normans largely imported their own forms from Normandy, incorporating little of the Anglo-Saxon architectural heritage. There are in fact examples of seemingly deliberate attempts to eliminate important Anglo-Saxon buildings and replace them with structures built along Norman lines. By contrast, in the Kingdom of Sicily, buildings erected after the arrival of the Normans feature a mix of styles, incorporating features of the earlier Islamic, Byzantine and local Italian Romanesque, as well as the Normans' own forms. It is difficult to say why such variance existed, but there are numerous possibilities. Some result from the way each state was formed: England had already existed as a kingdom when the Normans conquered the land and replaced the ruling class, while the Kingdom of Sicily was a creation of the Norman conquerors; furthermore, the length of time taken to complete the conquest contrasted greatly. Another reason is that the pre-conquest cultural situation varied, as England was overwhelmingly Anglo-Saxon, in juxtaposition to the Italian, Byzantine and Arab elements in the Mezzogiorno and Sicily. Additionally, the cultural and trading influence of the Byzantine Empire and Islamic nations may have contributed to the eclectic architecture found in the Kingdom of Sicily. Other forms of cultural and artistic expression in the Kingdom of Sicily likewise show a cultural blend absent in England. Finally, there will be a brief look at the political and social situation in the two realms, in order to understand if these cultural expressions are representative of dissimilar societies and models of government. In the Kingdom of Sicily, a number of non-Normans rose to prominence, and some families which had held power before continued to do so. In England, the Norman nobility was much larger and held far more high-ranking positions. Architectural differences are therefore somewhat symbolic.
Answer:
They moved west.
Explanation:
It is TRUE that the Iroquois MOVED WEST when the beaver population declined in the middle of the seventeenth century.
Initially, the Iroquois hunted for Beaver as a major source for fur production, which they trade with the European settlers. However, following the decline of the animal in the area of present-day New York, the Iroquois moved westward to hunt for more Beavers in the area of Ohio county.
Answer Below:
Northeast: There is New York's Statue of Liberty, Empire State Building, Brooklyn Bridge and Times Square; Pennsylvania's Liberty Bell and Independence Hall; and Massachusetts' Freedom Trail. Many of these originate as big Government buildings or like The Statue of Liberty it was a gift from france to celebrate and thank us for our friendship. (Represents freedom and democracy)
South: The South consist of many landmarks many originating from slavery. But someof the biggest like the Great Smoky Mountains National Park are natural landforms and have played a huge part such as boundaries for the 13 colonies.
Midwest: The Midwest may have some of the best landmarks such as rock carvings to archs reaching up to 630 ft. There is Mount Rushmore, Chimney Rock, Gateway Arch, Badlands National Park, The Mackinac Bridge, Cave of the Mounds, and Starved Rock State Park. These have a history of being natural to having some of our greatest Presidents carved into a cliff.
West: Many of these are natural such as Yellowstone and Yosemite national parks. These are beautiful landmarks and places to visit. Then we have the Golden Gate Bridge, The HollyWood sign, and Disney Land; these are mand made and are huge things that the surrounding places use as advertisments. What makes these important or historical is not much but just helped the West become one of the biggest visited places.
There were two major peaks of defense spending in the 20th century: World War 1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The dominance of Mughal Emperor Jahangir was declining with the popularity of Guru Arjan Dev.
That is why in 1606, this emperor order to capture Guru Arjan Dev, and he was sent to prison in Lahore Fort. Guru Arjan Dev became so popular in places like Northern India, where he converted many people to Sikhism. This, of course, upset emperor Jahangir because Arjan's popularity heavily threatened the elite in India, the leadership of the emperor, and the Orthodox Church.
Guru Arjan Dev had created the texts of the Sikh book "Adi Granth," a holy document for the Sikhism followers.
