Answer:
Napoleon gains power over the animals by two means. First, he twists the ideas of the animals' revolution to suggest that questioning his authority is tantamount to treason to Animal Farm, and the good of the whole. This is part of his larger strategy of manipulation of the truth. Squealer, his "propaganda minister," is especially adept at getting the animals to believe whatever is necessary to promote Napoleon's power. After Napoleon drives Snowball from the farm, for example, it is Squealer who convinces the animals that constructing the windmill was actually Napoleon's idea (even though Snowball had publicly endorsed it against Napoleon's wishes). He further suggests that Snowball, who had in fact fought bravely in the battles to establish Animal Farm, had in fact been in league with Jones, the farmer, the whole time. Snowball's ability to twist information is best exemplified by the winnowing down of the original Seven Commandments to one, which claims that while all animals are equal, some animals "are more equal than others."
The correct answer is: [A]:
____________________________________________________________
"<span>no other sources present the same information or point of view. "
____________________________________________________________</span>
In some<span> areas </span>called<span> a settlement </span>
Answer: D. He uses rhetorical questions to emphasize his main point.
That's the APEX answer, just answered it myself :)
Argumentation in text
One of most the fundamental things we use language for is argument. Arguing means claiming that something is true and trying to persuade other people to agree with your claim by presenting evidence to substantiate it. An argument is statement with three components:
A point of view, a claim, something we are arguing in favour of
The actual argument, the evidence we are using to argue with
A statement that links the initial claim to the argument and ensures that we understand how the argument functions.
The statement that connects the initial claim and the argument is referred to as the warrant. The warrant is thus an argument for the connection between the initial claim and the argument.
hope help
