Answer:
PLEASE SOMEONE DO THE DAY7 : TIME FOR ME. GIVING BRAINLIEST FOR WHOEVER GETS IT RIGHT!
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
With even just two points, you can find the equation of a line in slope-intercept form.
Slope-intercept form: where
is the slope and
is the y-intercept
<u>1) Solve for the slope (</u><u>)</u>
The equation to solve for the slope is when the two points are
and
. Plug the coordinates of these points into the equation and solve for
.
Then, plug into
.
<u>1) Solve for the y-intercept (</u><u>)</u>
Then, take any of the given points and plug it into along with the slope. Isolate
to get the y-intercept. Then, plug both m and b back into
to get your final equation.
I hope this helps!