Answer: I would actually disagree on this
Explanation: In America there was a time period where conscientious objectors were ordered by the government to vote. However, their denial to vote brought them severe prison time, torture and opposition. If 16 year olds could vote then people with religious beliefs or who are conscientious objectors would be bullied by political peers and such pressure could obligate them to go against their conscious and norms. From ages 16 to 18 a person is too young to commit the right decisions without a person actually influencing them. A person is capable of thinking for themselves without outward influences when they are about 21 and up. Also, voting is not necessary, it’s simple tradition. It’s a superficial thing, people think they choose the president but in reality it’s the Supreme Court who makes that decision for you. You could fact check that if you attend a civics class or if you directly ask a representative from congress.
The answer is B) The tone of the letter is too informal and lacks specific details. That is the answer because it uses opinions and lacks support for the claim.
Plz give brainliest answer :) :D.
Answer:
The story lines have been shorted, and important details have been left out
Explanation:
Since a movie can be aroun 1-2 hours maybe a little more the plot has to be at a more fast pace.
