<span>America focus changed to the affairs of
the nations in the Americas. The Monroe Doctrine asked the Europeans to keep
off the affairs of the Americas while promising to keep out of European
affairs. This aimed to keep the Europeans from the affairs of the Western
Hemisphere and the United States’ closest neighbors</span>
Strengths of AoC
- landmark in government
- provided loose confederation (at least some disjointed unity)
- kept alive the ideal of Union, held states together until they were ready to implement a strong constitution
- congress still effective in passing land laws (Land Ordinance of 1785, Northwest Ordinance)
Negatives of AoC
- Congress was extremely weak: no power to regulate commerce, states left free to establish laws that were different and in conflict with one another (tariffs, navigation)
- no tax-collection program.
Answer:
Most current communist groups descended from the Maoist ideological tradition still adopt the description of both China and the Soviet Union as being state capitalist from a certain point in their history onwards—most commonly, the Soviet Union from 1956 to its collapse in 1991 and China from 1976 to the present.
This is a opinion based answer but there is 3 main answers to this question one is yes they should be able to take their rights away because us having the freedom to do anything can be dangerous for the government second is no they shouldn’t just because we are going into war doesn’t give them the rights to take our freedoms away because it could cause more problems within the way and the third is no they shouldn’t be able too unless their given a valid reason to take their right and then give an example
The Egyptians believed their pharaoh to be the mediator between the gods and the world of men. As a divine ruler, the pharaoh was the preserver of the god-given order, called maat.
