D because you’re trying to prevent the distraction
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's *<u>final walk-through</u>*, and *<u>logs the evidence</u>*.
Explanation:
It's been a few years since I've taken the class, but I finished the class with my grade over 99% so I'm probably remembering this correctly.
EDIT: Emergency correction, Final Walk-Through is correct, Logs the Evidence is NOT. This narrows the second blank down to only two options, I'll leave it to whoever reads this to use common sense and guess between the two.
The reasons there are more private security than police are:
- It is expensive to fund more police.
- Need to fill in gap left by police.
- Getting into police is relatively difficult.
<h3>Why are there more private security than Police?</h3>
- As the police are funded by taxes, it would be a huge drain on the economy if more police officers were hired.
- There are many businesses and people in need of protection and because the police cannot be there all the time, private security is turned to.
- Police training and accreditation in a lot of cities in also quite cumbersome and intensive. A lot of people who apply don't make it.
In conclusion, there are several reasons for the disparity between police numbers and that of private security.
Find out more about private security at brainly.com/question/7203143.
Answer:
ARE THESE FREE POINTS!?!?!?!
Explanation:
<h2>PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</h2>
