I THINK it’s Elizabeth I but I’m not entirely sure
I think Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette should have been killed in the French Revolution. The royal couple had to move out of the castle because of a mob that marched Versailles. In August 1792 they were arrested by the sans-culottes. In September the monarchy was abolished by the national convention. In November evidence of Louis XVI counter revolutionary intrigues with Austria and other foreign nations. Marie Antoinette was later found guilty of treason and was put to death
The answer can go both ways for instance the Jap's thought if they did this that we will be weak but then we dominated an attacked right back they thought ( the suicide boomers) was that if they didn't do that they would be punished by not going to their heaven
Rulers ruled a cite and religion is a belief
This statement by James Madison argues that men are not perfect, and that human nature can be flawed. He believes government exists in order to control and limit the impact of these flaws.
One example is the separation of powers. The principle of the separation of powers states that power must be divided among different branches of government. The branches limit and control each other, and safeguard against the abuse of a tyrant. If people were not corrupted by power, or did not have a tendency to abuse power for their own gain, then the separation of powers would not be necessary. However, because human nature is flawed, these measures are necessary in government.
