Answer:
b. Short-term loss of $700 and a long-term gain of $900.
Explanation:
August 1, 2018, price per share $50
August 1, 2019, sold 50 shares at $36, resulting in a short term capital loss of ($700)
August 31, 2019, sold 50 shares at $68, resulting in a long term capital gain of $900
If you own a stock for 1 year or less, any gain/loss will be considered short term. If you own a stock for more than 1 year, any gain/loss will be considered long term.
Answer:
C) to determine the amount and/or percentage increase or decrease that has taken place.
Explanation:
Horizontal analysis can be regarded as an approach which is been used in analyzing financial statements through making comparism between specific financial information for a particular accounting period along with the information from other periods. This approach is been used by Analysts to make analysis of historical trends.
It should be noted that Horizontal analysis evaluates a series of financial statement data over a period of time to determine the amount and/or percentage increase or decrease that has taken place.
Answer:
B. Progressive elaboration
Explanation:
Progressive Elaboration is done for a specific project and then such planning is thoroughly descriptive and detailed, and the management tends to develop the plan more and more with each day, make it more accurate for the project.
In the given instance, since there is a requirement to know all the features along with characteristics of the project properly, the technique to be followed is Progressive Elaboration as all the detailed work will be done, and will be revised accordingly.
Therefore, the correct option is:
B. Progressive elaboration
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
Economics conditions, political stability and balance of payments 3
