Answer:
Maybe logged in wrong acct
Explanation:
1. Exposition -----> is when the characters are introduced
2. Rising Action ---> The events occurred to complicate the plot or suspense
3. Climax ---> The turning point in the story
4. Falling Action ---> what will happen as a result of the climax
5. Denouement --> Tells the results of the story
Read "What makes good people do bad things?", by MELISSA DITTMANN
Which statement best supports Zimbardo’s belief that people are not born “good” or “evil”?
A
. “‘Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein.’” ( Paragraph 3)
B
. “In one condition, they overheard an assistant calling the other students ‘animals’ and in another condition, ‘nice.’” ( Paragraph 8)
C
. “The same social psychological processes… that acted in the Stanford Prison Experiment were at play at Abu Ghraib, Zimbardo argued.” ( Paragraph 16)
D
. “As such, the Abu Ghraib soldiers' mental state… may have further contributed to their ‘evil’ actions, he noted.” ( Paragraph 18)
Answer: A
. “‘Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein.’” ( Paragraph 3)
Explanation:
Zimbardo claims that the line between good and evil is permeable, meaning that people are not born “good” or “evil”. On the contrary, everyone can cross that line, especially under certain circumstances. For example, the soldiers´ mental state and the lack of supervision, training, or accountability led to the abuse of an Iraqi prisoner in Abu Ghraib.
Okay so I can't help all of the way but basically it's just asking what rhetoric was used I think.
So rhetoric is Pathos, Ethos, and Logos
So pathos is using emotions in your literature, to maybe guilt you or make you feel something
Ethos is ethics, so basically the writer is trying to gain your trust by making you feel like they know exactly what they are writing about
Logos is using statistics, quotations or evidence to support them.
Hope this helps! Maybe attach the full page and I can help more
Smart cities could worsen existing problems when: B Certain areas of smart cities could be made more advanced than others, creating
greater inequality between citizens.
Smart cities are cities that makes use of technologies for the betterment of their citizen.
Smart cities could worsen existing problems as some particular areas may be far ahead in development than others which inturn lead to inequality as investors will tend to prefer the more advanced area than the less advance one.
In such situation the more advanced part will tend to enjoy more benefit than the others such as more job opportunities among others.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/22049609
