1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dafna1 [17]
3 years ago
8

Which one was not an invention that helped industrialize the textile industry?

History
2 answers:
klasskru [66]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

the answer is the spinning Jenny

Maru [420]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

the flying shuttle was not an invention that helped industrialize the textile industry

You might be interested in
Question 79
Karolina [17]
It is true because the us house of representatives
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you agree with the view that it was soldiers and civilians that cost Germany the war (WWI), not its leaders?
otez555 [7]
No, I do not agree that it was the soldiers and civilians that cost Germany the WWI. I believe that if the leaders had constructed a better thought out plan to defeat the other counties that they would have won. My current stand point is that if Germany appointed better Leaders that they could have easily took over Belgium within months.
8 0
3 years ago
Who was the red army?
Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

Red Army, Soviet army

Explanation:

created by the Communist government after the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. Political advisers called commissars were attached to all army units to watch over the reliability of officers and to carry out political propaganda among the troops. The name Red Army was abandoned in 1946.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two laws did the Supreme Court declare to be unconstitutional?
Ulleksa [173]

The correct answers are A and C.

A) National Recovery Administration: On 27 May 1935, in the court case of Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, the Supreme Court held the mandatory codes section of NIRA unconstitutional,[20] because it attempted to regulate commerce that was not interstate in character, and that the codes represented an unacceptable delegation of power from the legislature to the executive. Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote for a unanimous Court in invalidating the industrial "codes of fair competition" which the NIRA enabled the President to issue. The Court held that the codes violated the United States Constitution's separation of powers as an impermissible delegation of legislative power to the executive branch. The Court also held that the NIRA provisions were in excess of congressional power under the Commerce Clause.

The Court distinguished between direct effects on interstate commerce, which Congress could lawfully regulate, and indirect, which were purely matters of state law. Though the raising and sale of poultry was an interstate industry, the Court found that the "stream of interstate commerce" had stopped in this case: Schechter's slaughterhouses bought chickens only from intrastate wholesalers and sold to intrastate buyers. Any interstate effect of Schechter was indirect, and therefore beyond federal reach.

Specifically, the Court invalidated regulations of the poultry industry promulgated under the authority of the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, including price and wage fixing, as well as requirements regarding a whole shipment of chickens, including unhealthy ones, which has led to the case becoming known as "the sick chicken case." The ruling was one of a series which overturned some New Deal legislation between January 1935 and January 1936, and which ultimately caused Roosevelt to attempt to pack the Court with judges that were in favor of the New Deal.

Subsequent to the decision, the remainder of Title I was extended until April 1, 1936, by joint resolution of Congress (49 Stat. 375), June 14, 1935, and NRA was reorganized by E.O. 7075, June 15, 1935, to facilitate its new role as a promoter of industrial cooperation and to enable it to produce a series of economic studies, which the National Recovery Review Board was already doing. Many of the labor provisions reappeared in the Wagner Act of 1935.

C) Agricultural Adjustment Administration: On January 6, 1936, the Supreme Court decided in United States v. Butler that the act was unconstitutional for levying this tax on the processors only to have it paid back to the farmers. Regulation of agriculture was deemed a state power. As such, the federal government could not force states to adopt the Agricultural Adjustment Act due to lack of jurisdiction. However, the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 remedied these technical issues and the farm program continued.



7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After the revoution but before the constitution the us was governed by
Iteru [2.4K]
Each state governed itself.
The Articles of Confederation.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Geologic maps are most recognized by their _____.
    5·1 answer
  • ___ were indian soldiers who served under
    9·1 answer
  • Why would Japan want to emphasize teamwork in their society<br>​
    10·2 answers
  • NGOs are relief organizations that accomplish their goals without assistance from?
    10·2 answers
  • What are the human rights outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? Check all that apply.
    9·1 answer
  • Use what you read to answer this questi
    13·1 answer
  • How did hunger strikes by enslaved africans affect slave holders during the middle passage?
    14·1 answer
  • What did florence bascom contribute to science?
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone please write a small description about Civil Rights act-July 1968
    15·2 answers
  • What is the body of water that is bounded by Japan, China, and Taiwan?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!