Umm I'm pretty sure that is a statement, correct me if in wrong
The answer is already given at the end of the question; solely by the magnitude or severity of expected harm
When assessing risks of harm associated with participation in a research study, the probability of harm and the risk of the severity of harm are two distinctive elements of risk that must be considered. In probability of harm, the fact that not all possible harms are equally probable should be considered. How these two elements occur is a crucial factor in determining the level of risk of harm in a study. Given the sensitivity of the information in the case scenario above, the probability that an individual subject could be identified is low while the magnitude of the possible risk of harm is high.
Answer: 1. False 2. True
Explanation: Piracy in any capacity is in fact illegal and might possibly be a felony I'm not quite sure. But it's just like stealing a toy from the store, somebody worked hard to make it and you best be paying for it.
Software licenses on the other hand usually give you permission to install the software on one or many machines depending on the license you purchase, but usually, if you paid for it once, you can use it anywhere.
Answer:
The answer is "Option C".
Explanation:
Please find the complete question in the attached file.
The model presented above is an AI design. The specific variable within each AI model becomes reduced. There is also no AI model showing 100% reliability, or just not as reliable as just a man in certain situations. That is why the option C opposes this fact explicitly, and that model is least likely to benefit.
Answer: This problem statement does not provide a useful issue statement.
