1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marysya12 [62]
4 years ago
12

Explain ONE reason why the Eastern Roman Empire was spared much of the invasions that beset the Western Roman Empire.

History
1 answer:
Oduvanchick [21]4 years ago
3 0
I assume your talking about the HUNS... When the empire split in two the east had more gold and more resources and the dying west had to suffer all the barbarian attacks like the huns... The East quite simply was more prepared and had more walls and guards to defend their border also the Eastern Empire had the river danube north of them which helped deflect the Hunnic invasions and other barbarian invasion more west...
You might be interested in
God's unchangeableness is based upon the laws that govern our universe.<br> True<br> False
chubhunter [2.5K]
This is false.

His stability is not based on our laws or what we write.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these Australian Aboriginal populations would have suffered the LARGEST number of deaths in the 1780s and 1790s?
krok68 [10]

Answer:

C: Densely populated coastal settlements would have suffered the largest number of deaths.

Explanation:

After the Europeans started to settle in Australia, the Aborigines suffered multiple heavy hits. They were seen as primitive and useless, without value as people.

Europeans originally settled on the coast, where many Aborginals lived. They were carelessly murdered. Also, the diseases brought by the Europeans decimated the numbers of the Aborigines that were in contact with them, and very quickly their numbers went so low that they were on the verge of going extinct as people.

4 0
3 years ago
B What was<br> appeasement, and<br> why did Churchill<br> oppose it so<br> strongly?
kolezko [41]

Answer:

It is giving up principles to pacify an aggressor. Winston Churchill opposed the policy of appeasement by blatantly saying Britain and France had to choose between war and dishonor. They chose dishonor.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Chinese government respond to the Tiananmen Square protests?
Mekhanik [1.2K]
D, By deploying military forces to break up the protests.
8 0
3 years ago
4. Why was the Rush-Bagot Agreement seen as a victory for the US?
qwelly [4]
The rush bagot try answer is in the google for the answer
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP
    14·1 answer
  • Why was appointing church officials important to henry iv?
    8·1 answer
  • What did the Catholic Church believe was necessary for salvation
    14·1 answer
  • How did Europeans and Americans try to prevent another war after 1919?
    12·1 answer
  • US GOVERNMENT The United States and Mexico are...?
    13·2 answers
  • 9. What was the U.S. response to the Soviet Union after they said that the missiles would be returned to the Soviet
    12·1 answer
  • All of the following were ways the Maurya Empire promoted unity, prosperity, and
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement characterizes Japan’s economy during the Meiji Restoration? Japan’s economy limited trade with other nations bec
    9·2 answers
  • Why did Thomas Jefferson want to purchase New Orleans?
    13·1 answer
  • Match the following. 1 . Christian destroyed in A.D. 70 2 . Temple in Jerusalem Roman peace 3 . omniscient moral integrity 4 . P
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!