Which of the following best explains how the Laws of

History

1 answer:

Fittoniya [83]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The laws of Burgos established the relations between the Spanish settlers in the Americans, and the Native Americans.

Explanation:

It held that the Spanish monarch had a rightful right over the lands of the Americas that Spain conquered, because he was a representative of Christianity, and spreading Christianity over these "wild lands" made his rule legitimate and necessary.

The laws also held that Native Americans were subjects of rights, and thus, could not be enslaved, and had to be christinianized, but they also had duties: mainly, working for the benefit of the Spanish Crown.

You might be interested in

Why is it significant that much of the nation's wealth was owned by a small number of people?

azamat

Which nation? I take it you mean the United States or Great Britain?
Because a few people, unless they invest their money into capital, can only buy so much. How do you justify the purchase of multi million dollar race horses. Who benefits from such a purchase?

How do you justify the purchase of a mansion with 12 bathrooms? Who needs such a place except a family of 13 children and 2 parents?

However, if they are conscientious and spend on capital and business interests, they put their wealth to work and and create jobs which helps many people.

4 0

3 years ago

Lines 7-10 of Stanton's document exactly repeat the language used in the Deceleration of Independence, except for the addition i

RoseWind [281]

The original document said all men are created equal. When the author adds women to the the document tries to create conscience of women's rights.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What document was created and signed in November of 1620 because of the pilgrims took it upon themselves to create a document fo

Delicious77 [7]

The Mayflower Compact.

6 0

4 years ago

Why is it important to our justice system to have both judicial restraint and judicial activism?

matrenka [14]

Answer:Judicial activism interprets the Constitution to be in favor of contemporary values. ... Judicial restraint limits the powers of judges to strike down a law, opines that the court should uphold all acts and laws of Congress and legislatures unless they oppose the United States Constitution.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

What was the difference maker as to when people started to move west? Why didn't they before this?

Hunter-Best [27]

They had no idea what was over there

3 0

4 years ago