Answer:
No
Explanation:
The word "always" implied that the states should obey the federal government under any circumstances.
Most of the times, yes. I think it is important for the states to obey the federal government in order to maintain law and order in the country.
But, there's a chance that the federal government might impose a legislations that's violates the constitutions or human rights. At that point, the states need to be able to raise as the opposition from the central government.
The 3/5ths compromise was the law that designated how slaves were to be treated and represented. Previously an African American was counted as only 3/5ths of a person, hence the name of the compromise.
He doubled the size of the empire and ruled much of the Mediterranean world.
He created a code of law that helped unite the Byzantine Empire and later served as a model for the codes of law in many modern nations.
He built a huge domed cathedral called the Hagia Sophia, an enormous underground aqueduct, and a fabulous palace complex.
those are the answers for K12, OHVA to be exact
Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.