Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Answer:
El sistema social dominante en la Europa medieval, en el que la nobleza poseía tierras de la corona a cambio del servicio militar, y los vasallos eran a su vez principios de los nobles, mientras que los campesinos estaban obligados a vivir en la tierra de su Señor y rendirle homenaje, trabajo. y una parte del producto, teóricamente a cambio de protección militar.
Explanation:
Espero que esto ayude a marcar el MÁS CEREBRAL !!!
Answer:
Hamas is a Palestinian group that opposes Israeli rule. hope this helps
The Crusades is the series of wars between the two groups but if you're looking for a certain one I can further elaborate.
