1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iragen [17]
3 years ago
15

‼️HELP ASAP IF YOUR GOOD AT HISTORY‼️ MARKING BRAINLIEST ‼️

History
2 answers:
gladu [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

the answer is definitely B

Explanation:

because they didn't remove all soldiers from colonies, France didn't capture any territory, and the Indians never declared war on Britain

Anon25 [30]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

I would say answer B. The other answers are during the Revoluionary War that was caused BY the Decleration of Independance.

You might be interested in
Who was the first female president,and what year did she become president?
denpristay [2]

Answer:

Isabel Perón of Argentina, who was an vice-president who had succeeded in the presidency in 1974 after her husband died.

Explanation:

i hope this helps u

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ang pinuno ng partido komunista​
Paha777 [63]

Answer:

It just simple to answer

4 0
3 years ago
The Cultural Revolution ended by the early 1970s. In which three ways did it cause devastation in China?
MAXImum [283]

Answer:

1.  Ancient cultural artifacts and historical buildings were destroyed.

2. The education of millions of youth in China was interrupted.

3.  Mao was still in power when he died in September 1976.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why was the English bill of rights signed
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

For limitation.

Explanation:

Parliament passed the English bill to limit the power of king and queen. It also helped with freedom of speech ad improved elections.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
He second part of the declaration of independence best exemplifies the __________. division of powers separation of powers natur
Kobotan [32]

Answer:  Social contract theory

By "the second part," I presume you mean the list of grievances against the British government, which followed the first section (in which natural rights were a strong emphasis).

After asserting natural rights in the opening section, saying that "all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness," then the <em>Declaration of Independence </em>goes on to give a list of "facts to be submitted to a candid world." These facts were meant to demonstrate that the British king had been seeking to establish "an absolute Tyranny over these States" (the colonial states which were declaring their independence).  This was a violation of the social contract which exists between a government and those governed.

The list of grievances against the British government included items such as:

  • The king refused to assent to laws that were wholesome and necessary for the public good.
  • The king had forbidden colonial governors to enact laws or implement laws without his assent (which, as the prior point noted, he was in no hurry to give).
  • The king forced people to give up their rights to legislative assembly or forced legislative bodies to meet in difficult places that imposed hardships on them.
  • The king dissolved legislative assemblies and then refused for a long time to have other assemblies elected.
  • The king obstructed justice in the colonies and made judges dependent on his will alone for their salaries and their tenure in office.
  • The king kept standing armies in place in the colonies in peacetime, without the consent of the colonial legislatures.
  • The king imposed taxes without the colonists' consent.

These and additional items listed in the Declaration were meant to support the colonies' position that tyranny was standard operating procedure by the British monarchy, and therefore revolution was justified.  This was based on the idea of the social contract, that a government's authority to govern came from the people, and if the government did not serve the people properly, it could be replaced.   The Declaration asserted that principle in these words:  "When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them [the people] under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."


4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which groups had the most freedoms in<br> Russia in the 1800's?
    5·1 answer
  • How many senators are in the U.S. Senate?
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement describes the controversy caused by galileo's heliocentric theory?
    14·2 answers
  • How did the regents of the university of California v. Bakke Supreme Court decision affect affirmative action programs in the US
    14·2 answers
  • Which of Napoleon's actions most contributed to his defeat?
    5·2 answers
  • Georgia's Charter of 1732 did NOT include a provision that *
    7·1 answer
  • What did a Jacob’s Staff do for the 16th century navigation
    13·1 answer
  • How does the United States view terrorist groups in the Middle East? (AKS49d) (DOK 1)
    5·2 answers
  • A small group of socially and economically elite citizens that rules a country or other political unit.​
    11·1 answer
  • How did militiamen let down the US troops during the invasion of Canada in the war of 1812?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!