Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
In simple words, avoidable costs refers to those expenditures which can be avoided by the management of the business if they want to as such expenditures are usually made for additional support.
Irrelevant costs include factors which will not be impacted by a management action, whether positively or negatively. Consequently, unnecessary factors, such as static overhead as well as sunken factors, are overlooked in making the choice. Nonetheless, in addition to ultimately save the company it is important for a management to be able to discern an insignificant expense.
Answer:
0.76
Explanation:
So, in this particular question we are given that that there are two assets which are the; [1]. stock fund and [2]. a long-term government and corporate bond fund.
From the question/problem, we have that the Expected ret and the std. dev. for the Stock fund is 18% and 25% respectively. Also, the Expected ret and std. dev. for Bond fund 11% and 18% respectively.
Thus, the investment proportion in the minimum variance portfolio of the bond fund = 1 - [ ( 18%)² - 0.4 × 25% × 18%) ÷ ( 25%)² + (18%)² - 2 × 0.4 × 25% × 18%. = 1 - [0.0144 ÷ 0.0609 ] = 1 - 0.24 = 0.76.
Answer: To afford to retire
Explanation: The life cycle theory was established by Modigliani in 1957. This theory states that a rational individual manages its expenses with the motive of saving sufficient amount till his or her retirement.
As per this theory, the individual consumes almost same amount of income which leads to the situation of borrowing in times of low income and savings in times of high income.
However the minor differences leads to savings high than borrowings in times of low income the individual significant lowers his or her capital expenditure.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
When supply is perfectly inelastic, the supply curve is vertical as shown in the attached plot. Thus, the tax that shifts the supply curve upward would have no effect on the equilibrium quantity or price paid by consumers. Since equilibrium quantity or price paid by consumer don't change there's no burden on them. However, no team's owners would receive a lower after tax price and thus bearing the entire tax burden.
Some potential economic consequences that Richard did not consider before making his decision are:
- The cost of maintenance for used trucks.
- The cost of gasoline from the town to the nearest city.
- The location of the places that goods will be transported to and from.
<h3>What are economic considerations?</h3>
These are the factors that will affect the profitability and viability of a business.
In Richard's case, he needed to have considered various costs such as the higher cost of maintaining used trucks and the cost of gasoline that he will incur for living so far from big cities.
He also needs to consider the distance his trucks will have to travel to pick up good and deliver them.
Find out more on economic considerations at brainly.com/question/13721949.
#SPJ1
