1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
algol [13]
3 years ago
15

Which King used a Rule by Terror approach they used police force organized to track down and murder “traitors” and destroyed nob

les?
A.
Peter the Great


B.
Vlad Dracula


C.
Ivan IV


D.
Catherine the Great
History
1 answer:
Delicious77 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Correct answer is C.  Ivan IV

Explanation:

C is correct answer because it refers to Russian ruler Ivan IV the Terrible who destroyed many famous Russian boyar families, and thus started his reign of horror that lasted until his death.

A is not correct because Peter the Great was a famous leader of Russia that built a great Empire with many reforms.

B is not correct as Vlad was a ruler that tried to fight off the Ottomans.

D is not correct as Catherine the Great  was famous for her enlightenment ideas in Russia, although she did ordered her husband to be removed.

You might be interested in
Which three actions or events were most critical in the social economic and political transformation of china into a global powe
djyliett [7]

Answer:

China overtakes the United States and is already in 2014 the world's leading economic power, according to the latest data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). A milestone that comes five years earlier than expected, because until now those who lost from the IMF had changed this historic change until 2019.

Specifically, China's GDP in 2013 reached 16.15 trillion dollars and that of the United States, which has been the first power on the planet since it surpassed the United Kingdom in 1872, exceeded that level to climb to 16.77 million of dollars. A year later, the scenario changes: China adds 17.632 trillion and the United States, 17.416 trillion, in a new world order that will be maintained for at least the next five years, according to the IMF.

And is that the difference between China and the US USA It will be expanded in favor of the first until 2019, the last year for which the Fund prepares forecasts (see attached table). In that exercise, the Chinese GDP will be 26.9 trillion dollars and that of the United States, 22.1 trillion.

It is the result of the solid growth rates of the Asian tiger, which will reach 7.4% this year and 7.1% in 2015. More long-term, China, which faces the challenge of achieving a "soft landing" In a transition towards a more sustainable economy and dependent on domestic demand, it will grow 6.8% in 2016, 6.6% a year later, 6.4% in 2018 and 6.3% in 2019.

Meanwhile, the US, which bears the weight of budgetary imbalances and with a slow advance in the labor market, will accelerate 2.2% in 2014 and 3.1% in 2015. Already in 2016, the rate will be 3%, to go to 2.9% in 2017 and 2.7% in 2018. The Fund series closes in 2019, when this slowdown is confirmed at 2.6%. However, the United States is still much richer than China, where per capita income accounts for only a fifth of Americans.

This measurement is carried out in purchasing power parity, the most rigorous, since it is not subject to exchange rate volatilities, as it does in the calculation based on the volume of GDP in current dollars. In the latter case, none of the international organizations predicts a similar relief.

What does occur in one measure or another is a sharp decline in Spain. The country, which in 2007 boasted of playing in the economic Champions League, goes from the twelfth place before the crisis to the seventeenth. Thus, it loses 5 positions in the ranking due to purchasing power parity, being overtaken by Canada, Indonesia, Korea, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

In the current dollar ranking, the weight loss is much more evident, as it gives up seven places. From eighth place in 2007 it falls to fourteenth in 2019, surpassed by India, Brazil, Russia, Canada, Korea, Australia and Mexico.

Explanation:

In 1946, the world began to be governed by the military policies and actions undertaken and directed by Washington and Moscow, which formed a new international order led by a formal dimension, represented by the United Nations, and an informal one, embodied in The War. Cold The latter, which in fact modeled and gave reality to the international order and enabled a specific geopolitics, ended in 1991. European states became a second-order power, retaining historical credentials, but few levers of real power.

By 1992, many observers identified Washington as the great global power. Many spoke of the United States as a hyperpower, something that really had only been from 1945 to 1949, when it had the most advanced form of military destruction, the nuclear bomb, alone.

The People's Republic of China has rapidly become, without contemplation or pause –since the government reforms introduced by Deng Xiaoping, from 1978–, a growing economic power. It was industrially reformed, with very evident supports in industry and in the scientific development that emerged from the 1979 university reform, which had as its central point its de-ideologization and the full introduction of the main world scientific and technological developments.

6 0
3 years ago
The answer to number 20
Katen [24]
The delegates  discussed improvements for the Articles of Confederation, this was in September 1786 and the delegates actually called for the Constitutional convention.
:)
3 0
3 years ago
In this passage, Hobbes discusses the nature of the government that people create with their social contract.
kherson [118]

Answer:

<h2>be completely powerful</h2>

<u>Further details:</u>

Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan</em> in 1651.  The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society.  In Hobbes' view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast).   Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests.  So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen.  And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.

Probably the most famous set of lines from Hobbes' <em>Leviathan</em> book describes what he saw as the natural state of human affairs without government -- one in which every individual had freedom, but that meant it was a situation of "war of all against all," or we might say, every man for himself.  Hobbes wrote:

  • <em>In such condition, there is no place for industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving, and removing, such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.</em>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What led to the conflict within the Republican Army after its victory at San Antonio
Colt1911 [192]
They got showered in gold and riches
7 0
3 years ago
What did nativists groups believe would happen if European ethnic groups continued to immigrate to the United States after World
zlopas [31]

Answer:

<h3>The Anglo ideal would disappear.</h3>

Explanation:

After World War I, nativists groups in U.S started to fear that if European ethnic groups continued to immigrate to the United States after, their anglo ideal and culture would disappear.

With increase in immigration from Europe after the end the World War I, the native-born Americans of European lineage felt threatened with the multiplicity of European languages, cultures, and religions increasing in the U.S.

In order to preserve their own culture and language, the nativists started numerous protests for new immigration policies. Subsequently,the Emergency Immigration Act of 1921 was introduced. For the first time, it put certain restrictions on European immigration in U.S.

The National Origins Act of 1924 was further introduced to restrict southern and eastern European immigrants. The political unrest in Russia after the end of the first World War led many eastern Europeans to migrate to U.S and other countries.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the concentration camps who were less likely to get executed
    12·1 answer
  • What was key to the Supreme Court's argument in the verdict of the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case?
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement accurately describes Spanish colonization in new world?
    9·1 answer
  • Casualties were staggering in the Great War , mainly because of new technologies. Which of the following was NOT used in the gre
    5·1 answer
  • How did different group of Americans help america win world war 1?
    5·1 answer
  • What are three facts that you know about Cold War
    11·2 answers
  • The Dust Bowl was a devastating drought that occurred during the
    15·1 answer
  • Which is the resaon the great depression started
    13·2 answers
  • Compare Roosevelt's New Deal, Kennedy's New Frontier, and Johnson's Great Society. How are they similar, and how they are differ
    7·1 answer
  • What Act was found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court because of the wording of the Fourteenth Amendment?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!