For his own sake, no. What he did blatantly put himself in danger and finally was placed under interrogation, etc & so forth.
For the sake of science, yes. What he did, and the consequences thereof, would have publicised his struggle, especially during the age of Enlightenment. Although what he did might also have momentarily pushed people away from science in fear of the consequences of facing the church due to the harsh punishment that he was subjected to. His persistence was, in the end only healthy for the development of science in later years.
B
"The argument also assumes that social prejudice can also be overcome by legislation"
the laws assume that you are able to overcome social prejudice without the constitution determining it; you do it by legislation.
i hope this helped you a bit!
"Greeks" is the one civilization among the following choices given in the question that had a cyclical view of history. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option. It was during the time of the roman Empire that this kind of <span>cyclical view of history can be detected. I hope it helps you.</span>
Answer:
wait what is there a passage for this mb lol
Explanation:
