Answer:
Mel
If Mel is risk-neutral, then in the absence of trip insurance, the most she will be willing to pay for the cruise is _______.
c. $1,220
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Mel's value of a cruise in nice weather = $2,000
Mel's value of a cruise in bad weather = $50
Probability of nice weather = 60%
Probability of bad weather = 40%
Expected value:
Weather Outcome Probability Expected Value
Nice weather $2,000 60% $1,200
Bad weather $50 40% $20
Total expected value of a cruise $1,220
Answer:
Consider the following analysis.
Explanation:
The manager's assumption is that the employee work only for their own benefits and they need immediate punishment for poor work, intermediation, and minute-level supervision. This proves that he uses Theory X.
The upper management, on the other hand, is trying to initiate consultation with the employees before bringing out any improvement plan in the business process. This type of management style implicitly assumes that the employees are motivated and self-directed. This is Theory Y.
So, the first option should be correct.
Equity theory is something not contextual here. Equity theory works on the reduction of perceived inequality in the input and output of the employees as a means of motivation.
Answer:
Explanation:
When an individual’s current money income exceeds his current consumption desires, hesaves the excess. Rather than keep these savings in his possession, the individual mayconsider it worthwhile to forego immediate possession of the money for a larger futureamount of consumption. This trade-off of present consumption for a higher level of futureconsumption is the essence of investment.An investment is the current commitment of funds for a period of time in order to derivea future flow of funds that will compensate the investor for the time value of money, theexpected rate of inflation over the life of the investment, and provide a premium for theuncertainty associated with this future flow of funds.2.Students in general tend to be borrowers because they are typically not employed so haveno income, but obviously consume and have expenses. The usual intent is to invest themoney borrowed in order to increase their future income stream from employment - i.e.,students expect to receive a better job and higher income due to their investment ineducation.3.In the 20-30 year segment an individual would tend to be a net borrower since he is in arelatively low-income bracket and has several expenditures - automobile, durable goods,etc. In the 30-40 segment again the individual would likely dissave, or borrow, since hisexpenditures would increase with the advent of family life, and conceivably, the purchaseof a house.In the 40-50 segment, the individual would probably be a saver since incomewould have increased substantially with no increase in expenditures. Between the ages of50 and 60 the individual would typically be a strong saver since income would continueto increase and by now the couple would be “empty-nesters.”After this, depending uponwhen the individual retires, the individual would probably be a dissaver as incomedecreases (transition from regular income to income from a pension).4.The saving-borrowing pattern would vary by profession to the extent that compensationpatterns vary by profession. For most white-collar professions (e.g., lawyers) incomewould tend to increase with age. Thus, lawyers would tend to be borrowers in the earlysegments (when income is low) and savers later in life. Alternatively, blue-collarprofessions (e.g., plumbers), where skill is often physical, compensation tends to remainconstant or decline with age. Thus, plumbers would tend to be savers in the earlysegments and dissavers later (when their income declines).5.The difference is because of the definition and measurement of return. In the case of theWSJ, they are only referring to the current dividend yield on common stocks versus thepromised yield on bonds. In the University of Chicago studies, they are talking about thetotal rate of return on common stocks, which is the dividend yield plus the capital gain or
Answer:
diminishing marginal utility.
Explanation:
The term diminishing marginal utility is used to describe the common pattern whereby each marginal unit of a consumed good provides less of an addition to utility than the previous unit.
In Economics, The law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the unit of a good or service consumed by an individual increases, the additional satisfaction he or she derives from consuming additional units would start decreasing or diminishing as the units of good or service consumed increases.
<em>For example, buying a chocolate bar and eating it may satisfy your cravings but eating another one wouldn't give you as much satisfaction as the first due to diminishing marginal utility. </em>
Answer: $3,425
Explanation: Quarterly compounding periods for 18 years is 4 x 18 = 72 and the payment amount is $2,000.
2000 (1+.03/4)^72 = 3425.11
