<span>–1 + 6(–1 – 3x) > –39 – 2x.
Multiply the number outside of the parenthesis(6) by the numbers inside of the parenthesis(-1 and -3x)
-1 - 6 - 18x> -39 - 2x
Add 2x to both sides so that the x variable is only on one side
-1 - 6 - 16x> -39
Add 1 to both sides
-6 - 16x> -38
Add 6 to both sides
-16x> -32
Divide both sides by -16 so that the only thing that remains is the variable x on one side. Also, since you are dividing by a negative number, you automatically flip the greater than side to less than.
Final Answer: x< -2</span>
F(n) = 75*1/5n
This is because the base value would be 75 and it is divided by 5 each part of the sequence.
Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
q=r+rst
Rewrite the equation as
r+rst=q
Subtract r from both sides of the equation.
r st=q−r
Divide each term by rt
(r st )/rt=(q/rt)−(r/rt)
Cancel the common factor.
(
s=(q/rt)−1/t
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
RUTS is a rectangle.
To prove:
∠USR ≅ ∠SUT
Statements Reasons
1. RUTS is a rectangle 1. Given
2. RU = ST, UT = RS 2. By the definition of a rectangle
3. ∠STU = ∠SRU = 90° 3. Definition of a rectangle
4. ΔURS ≅ ΔSTU 4. By the LL theorem of congruence
5. ∠USR ≅ ∠SUT 5. CPCTC
