Answer:
The suffix -ism to a word is to encompass a related system, theory, or practice.
Answer:
But I would ask Representative Weaver: Do not nearly half of all accidents involve men and would not the streets be safer, then if male drivers were outlawed? And what about the percentage of accidents that occur on paved roads-should we do away with paved roads too?
Answer:
What causes these changes are interpersonal interactions, the degree of intimacy and the degree of formality.
Explanation:
Our speaking situations are modified, basically, by the relationship established between us and the listener, as well as our degree of intimacy and formality of the place where we are. In this case, we can affirm that in our family and in our community, we establish relationships of less formality and more intimacy, which allows a less formal and more relaxed communication. At escalo, we can also present this type of interaction, as we can present a more formal interaction that requires more cultured and rigid communication.
"Nonstandard forms of English imply close relationships and family values" best summarizes the central idea of the excerpt.
The narrator describes the customized version of English she uses with her mother and how she has developed a derivative of it with her husband over time ("over the twenty years we’ve been together I’ve often used that same kind of English with him").
You could call it "nonstandard" because it may appear as grammatically incorrect to native English speakers ("Not waste money that way").
This nonstandard form of English is closely linked to family relationships because we are told that it is "the language [the narrator] grew up with," her "family talk." Moreover, from this family talk, she developed a "language of intimacy" with her husband, who we can guess is a native English speaker used to hearing her speak that way.