To help form the idea for the area of inquiry, and self-reflect.
Answer:
A, It teaches a lesson about human behavior (Sorry i answered late.)
Explanation:
I took the test and got it correct
Answer:
Public forum.
Explanation:
A group discussion can be defined as a form of communication in which a group of people meet face-to-face (one on one) or connect remotely (via the internet) to exchange ideas, interact, and share opinions on a common topic or subject matter.
Generally, group discussions comprises of members and a leader who is saddled with the responsibility of presenting the topic, stating the facts and overall coordination of the discussion. Also, the various members involved in the group discussion are able to connect what they see, hear and how everyone responds to each other.
A public forum is a form of group discussion in which there's a moderator that moderates the discussion and ensure members abide by set rules.
Hence, public forum is a situation or meeting in which people can talk about a problem or matter especially of public interest in a public place.
For example, the need for a citizen to get a personal voting card (pvc) and exercise his or her fundamental rights by voting during an election may be discussed on a public forum.
There are three main leadership styles that are widespread known.
The first one is the "Laissez-Faire Leadership" in which consist of minimal direction and supervision. One disadvantage of this kind of leadership is that the control could get lost by the direction and the response of employees does not meet the expectations of the job or the project.
The second one is the "Autocratic Leadership", which has been traditional across the years. This style consist of a constant supervision, which can cause stress on the employees and lack of creativity and propositivity by the team.
The last one and balanced one is the "Participative Leadership" in which it is intended to be in the middle of the two firts approach, giving to the team the freedom of use their own initiative but having at the same time a guideness and a control on the project. The disadvantage is that the balance is not easy to manage and either the team can get lost on guideliness or the leader can restrict in some way the initiatives of the team and this can lead to demotivation.
