1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mumz [18]
3 years ago
7

I need help I really don’t know

History
1 answer:
Maurinko [17]3 years ago
7 0

Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.

In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.

In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.

You might be interested in
Which statement is true of the 90th Infantry Division?
Angelina_Jolie [31]
The answer is D! I hope this helped you
8 0
3 years ago
Please help i will give you 40 points: Which idea was part of the Second Great Awakening?
Nikolay [14]
Please help i will give you 90 points: How did Susan B. Anthony affect the women's suffrage movement?

She served as president of the the National Women's Suffrage Association.

She started a feminist newspaper that focused on abolition.

She was a traveling African American preacher who made speeches about abolition and women's suffrage.

She created the National Women's Party, which was known for bold protests.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was developed outside the constitution?
nevsk [136]
The Bill of Rights is apart of the constitution, whereas the democratic party and political parties are not mentioned in the constitution. I would go with political parties since they were developed during the same time as the constitution and is broader than just democrats (the democratic party was founded in the early 1820s.)
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A headright is a:
inna [77]

Answer:

a) land grant

Explanation:

These grants were given to settlers of the Americas.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A common goal of the Glorious, American, and French revolutions was
Georgia [21]
Only that they both deposed an unpopular king. After that they differ....The British 'Glorious' was done without bloodshed or violence, and a new Queen (the deposed Kings daughter) was right away placed on throne as new leader, leading to peace and prosperity. The French...was done with lots of violence, rioting and bloodshed including the execution of the deposed king, the queen and their children. The French never got around to placing a new king or leader on the murdered king's throne, so chaos was the result.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 24 POINTS!!!!! NEED HELP NOW!!! Blank war considers Civilian targets as contributing to the cor civilian target as contributing
    15·1 answer
  • Compared to 2020, WA workers in the 1800's had more protections and better working conditions. True or False? answer quickly!
    5·1 answer
  • How were americans able to know about japanese plans against the united states in the pacific?
    7·1 answer
  • The "half-way covenant" was created in the mid-1700s in order to A) increase the population of the southern colonies. B) attract
    13·2 answers
  • Match each vocabulary word to the correct definition.
    7·1 answer
  • In the Chinese calendar, the year 2018 was the Year of the Dog. When will the next Year of the Dog be?
    9·2 answers
  • Select the two houses of England's Parliament. Senate House of Lords House of Commons House of Representatives Knesset
    9·2 answers
  • During the Tokugawa shogunate, Japan became
    11·1 answer
  • 1. In your opinion, when did the American Revolution begin…
    7·1 answer
  • Identify the policies of the Monroe Doctrine. True or false
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!