The way the artwork below exemplifies nonrepresentational (or non-objective) art is:
- it does not represent anything we could identify.
<h3>What is Art?</h3>
This refers to the form of expression which is used by a painter or artist to create an impression about the artistic impressions of whatever he wants.
With this in mind, we can see that from the given art above, we can see that because it is nonrepresentational and makes use of abstract features, we cannot identify anything which it represents.
Read more about non objective art here:
brainly.com/question/1407430
Not only was he a well-known painter, he was also a Brilliant inventor.
One conflict that surfaced was the issue of states’ rights versus federal power. Both sides had arguments that only angered one another and worsened the situation. The individual states argued that the tariffs enacted by the government were unconstitutional. Their claim said the government was violating states rights by pushing tariffs on the states without their consent.
What was your relfection or insperati0on for this fine art work.
