Answer:
3.
Explanation:
1 Wouldn't be it since the story was thing everyone wanted.
2 Rescued wouldn't count since it's in the phrase when the question asking is about what the phrase is.
And 4 wouldn't work since the story is about the dog.
So by that method, 3 is your best bet!
Answer:
Empirical evidence
Explanation:
Machiavelli uses Empirical evidence so that he can point out the use of power.
I'd say It plainly establish that the purpose of the article is to describe the resignation
Answer:
fragment
Explanation:
no subject, just verb. For it to be a <em>c</em><em>o</em><em>m</em><em>p</em><em>l</em><em>e</em><em>t</em><em>e</em> sentence, it would need a subject to accomodate the verb.
Complete sentence:
<u>H</u><u>e</u> <u>c</u><u>o</u><u>m</u><u>m</u><u>a</u><u>n</u><u>d</u><u>e</u><u>d</u> the continental army in the revolutionary war.
The slippery slope fallacy is something that many people fall into while writing something persuasive. This fallacy mostly happens when it is a primarily emotional argument with no factual support. The way it works is you make a claim that isn't entirely true, and then you base the rest of your argument on this point, even more "facts" off of this one slightly true fact you have stated. An example of this would be: "We can't allow people to go treasure hunting. By going treasure hunting people are more likely to trespass on other people's land in order to find treasure. By making trespassing less serious, people will start to loss their sense of other people's privacy. As you can see, if we allow people to pursuer treasure hunting, they will eventually start to break into other people's homes."
