Answer:
Nietzsche’s philosophical thoughts on morality argue that a moral code is not in our nature, while
Zimbardo’s argument is that we shouldn’t expect our decisions to be
influenced by morality alone. Nietzsche’s thoughts on morality are
grounded in opposition to Christianity. He begins his argument by
quoting from the Bible, “If thy eye offend thee, pluck it out,” before
labeling the Christian idea as “stupidity” (Paragraph 1). Nietzsche argues
that sensuality is in opposition to Christianity and that the church
“always wanted the destruction of its enemies; we, we immoralists and
Antichristians” (Paragraph 5), adding that “Life has come to an end
where the ‘kingdom of God’ begins” (Paragraph 8). In contrast, Zimbardo
bases his argument on science and proposes that the electric shock
experiment by psychologist Stanley Milgram “provides several lessons
about how situations can foster evil” (Paragraph 5). He also uses
conclusions from a 1974 experiment by Harvard anthropologist John
Watson, as well as his own simulated jail experiment, the 1971 Stanford
Prison Experiment, to help support his argument.
Answer:
A. It is often considered to be about romance, but can also be examined as a story about the impact of violent environments on youth.
Explanation:
Assuming you are talking about the passage “Teaching Shakespeare in a Maximum Security Prison” by Michel Martin, then I have done this test already.
Answer:
I believe that everyone was born pure and innocent; Being hateful has to do with the way you were taught when you were little or the people surrounding you. If the people around you have good manners then you'll grow used to it and also have good manners. It all depends on your surroundings.
Answer:
1. lunch and dinner
2. towel
3. incorrectly
4. door bell
5. age
6. she fell off the bottom rung
7. envelope
8. because she sleeps at night
9. all are married
10. add a 'g' to it and it's 'gone'
please make brainliest. :))
Answer:
metaphor is only type of imagery used in this line
Explanation:
he was talking like it was a metaphor
