1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anarel [89]
3 years ago
15

Paano nabago ang buhay ng mga tao ng sila ay matutong magtanim at mag-alaga ng hayop?

History
2 answers:
patriot [66]3 years ago
8 0
Sorry but I have no idea what this says
kykrilka [37]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Nangangahulugan ang pagsasaka na hindi kailangang maglakbay ang mga tao upang makahanap ng pagkain. Sa halip, nagsimula silang manirahan sa mga nakatira na mga pamayanan, at nagtanim ng mga pananim o nagtataas ng mga hayop sa kalapit na lupain. Nagtayo sila ng mas malakas, mas permanenteng mga bahay at pinalibutan ng pader ang kanilang mga pamayanan upang maprotektahan ang kanilang sarili.

Explanation:)

You might be interested in
Who did hitler see as an unperfect race.
igor_vitrenko [27]
Jewish people were unperfect
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(NEED HELP) In this assignment, you will write a three- to four-paragraph Supreme Court opinion for
liberstina [14]

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane D. Kirstein, U .S. Attorney's Office, San Antonio, TX, Plaintiff–Appellee. Laura G. Greenberg, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Bradford W. Bogan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender's Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant–Appellant.

In this case, we must decide whether the district court's imposition of a condition of supervised release prohibiting the defendant from “residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer” was plainly erroneous. We conclude it was not and AFFIRM.

I.

In January 1990, Michael Fields was convicted in Wisconsin state court of second degree sexual assault of a child.1 He was sentenced to five years in prison, but only served one year; the rest of his term was probated. Fields was required to register as a sex offender in Wisconsin for the rest of his life. Because of this conviction, he must also register as a sex offender in Texas. Fields has thrice been arrested and convicted for failing to register as a sex offender.2 He has also been repeatedly told by state authorities in both Wisconsin and Texas that he must register as a sex offender, instructions with which it appears he has never complied.3

Fields was arrested by the Austin Police Department for failing to register as a sex offender in April 2013. The next month, he was indicted in federal court and charged with one count of failing to register as a sex offender in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”).4 After unsuccessfully moving to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that SORNA was unconstitutional, Fields pled guilty in July 2013.

In November 2013, Fields appeared before the district court for his sentencing hearing. At that hearing, the court reviewed Fields's criminal history record, and concluded that, even discounting several convictions where it was disputed as to whether Fields committed the crime, he had “a solid criminal record since 1974.” After hearing from counsel, the court then sentenced Fields to a 27–month sentence of imprisonment, followed by ten years of supervised release. The supervision included a number of conditions, including, as relevant here, a requirement that:

The defendant shall follow all other lifestyle restrictions or treatment requirements imposed by the therapist, and continue those restrictions as they pertain to avoiding risk situations throughout the course of supervision. This includes not residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer.

Fields did not object to this condition. This timely appeal follows.

II.

We normally review conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion.5 In this case, because Fields did not object to his supervised release condition while before the district court, we review for plain error.6 As the Supreme Court has made clear, plain error is a demanding standard:

6 0
3 years ago
The British Empire's Proclamation of 1763 prohibited white settlers from crossing over the Appalachian mountains into territory
Pani-rosa [81]

Answer:

The British Empire's Proclamation of 1763 prohibited white settlers from crossing over the Appalachian mountains into territory reserved for Native Americans. White settlers responded by

Explanation:

I hope this helps :)

5 0
2 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST! Name two nations that controlled Vietnam during the 1940’s.
guapka [62]

Answer:

Japanese...........

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which sentences describe the advantages of cogeneration?
suter [353]
Could you provide the sentence
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How are minerals extracted from the Earth and processed
    6·1 answer
  • What events in 2017 relates to the events that lead to the civil war of 1861?
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP
    14·1 answer
  • How are the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank similar?
    11·1 answer
  • ¿Que son los Homínidos?<br> Perdón por pregunta tan boba pero estoy probando esta pagina.
    10·1 answer
  • Examine the events that fostered the tension between the colonists and King George III/Parliament leading up to the American Rev
    11·1 answer
  • What is michael r pence employment experience
    13·1 answer
  • How is Social Security<br> an<br> example of income redistribution?
    10·1 answer
  • What were citizens of the polis expected to do?
    15·2 answers
  • Horses and buffalo were both
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!