Answer:
popular because that's what we need right now in are country
A parent argues that violation of a free appropriate public education often starts with the evaluative process because, with free education, students might begin to take schools and colleges for granted.
<h3>Disadvantages of Free Public Education</h3>
- Schools wouldn't exert as much effort to conserve funds and adhere to a budget if college was free. These schools would engage in wasteful expenditure practices as they are aware that they will always receive financing.
- Additionally, since education is free for everybody, private colleges would no longer need to compete for students.
- Students might not take school as seriously if it is free. Because their education is being given to them for free, they won't value it.
- When tuition is paid out of their own pockets, students are more likely to put more effort into their studies.
- In the US, the state is frequently responsible for paying for public education. The money would have to come from other crucial programs that many low-income families rely on if a state's budget didn't have enough money to finance free college.
To learn more about free public education refer to:
brainly.com/question/23566306
#SPJ4
Answer:
Arcuate nucleus
Explanation:
Arcuate nucleus is situated in the Hypothalamus and consists of neurons that are sensitive to incoming hunger signals and another area that responds to satiety signals. In recent years, researchers and scientists have singled out the Arcuate nucleus for the regulation of hunger. Previously it was believed that some other areas of the hypothalamus were also important. However, this is not the case after recent research and arcuate nucleus is considered responsible for regulation of hunger.
Answer:
please give me brainliest
Answer:
Kickback
Explanation:
Receiving or giving of kickback is a form of bribery that involves the demand or giving of commissions to an employee or public official such as a police officer for a service rendered. This practice is unethical and wrong as it interferes with the police officers ability to make unbiased judgement.
The action of officer Andrew in accepting the kickback is wrong and can be classified as bribery.