The introduction is the beginning of an essay , when the readers read your essay the introduction is basically going to tell them the main idea or the plot , the introduction supports the whole thing that you are writing , basically you are giving all the things that are going to be discuss.Without this the whole body of the text is not going to be explicit as necessary .
<span />
Answer:
- After eating lunch at the cafeteria, Ben went to the gym to have a swim.
- Due to the damage caused by the storm, the ferry will not be running today.
- The company's training session, which was due to take place on Tuesday, has been postponed.
- If you are going to college this autumn, don't forget to sign up for a discount card.
Explanation:
Commas are punctuation marks that separate and help organize words, clauses, and concepts in a sentence. They usually follow participial phrases that introduce a sentence.
An adverbial phrase such as "After eating lunch at the cafeteria" at the beginning of a sentence, should be followed by a comma. Nonrestrictive clauses such as "which was due to take place on Tuesday" are should be set off by commas. If a dependent clause is used to introduce a sentence, it should be followed by a comma.
Answer: My family is staying fit by taking walks throughout our neighborhood and playing outside together as a family. These exercises have helped me and my family be happier and healthier during the pandemic. Next week to continue staying healthy though exercise my family and I are going to continue with these exercises such as the walking in the neighborhood and going outside. These things put together will help me and my family stay healthy and fit.
"Troubled Times" 4 is the best for citation there from those choices, one thing you never do while citing is do "Troubled Times" p.4. Why? because it doesn't look half as good as "Troubled Times 4", there is my answer.
The correct answer is C. The author of passage 1 believes fish farming is beneficial to the environment, while the author of Passage 2 believes fish farming is not the solution to overfishing
Explanation:
The two passages provide a different about fish farming, which is the practice that involves raising fish rather than capturing them in their natural habitat. In the case of the passage 1, the author proposes fish farming is beneficial because this stops the problem of overfishing, this can be seen in "Fish farming helps humans continue to consume fish while protecting valuable marine resources" that shows fish farming is the way to protect the environment and the populations of fish while benefitting humans.
On the opposite, the author of passage 2 exposes the negative effects of fish farming and in this way shows this is not a solution. This can be seen in "one of the major problems with fish farming is water supply contamination" or in "it also causes destructions to habits" that supports the idea fishing farming does not solve the problems caused by overfishing.
