Answer:
It is known as pluralistic ignorance.
Explanation:
Pluralistic ignorance occurs in social situations when an individual does not feel free to express their opinion and makes a wrong inference of what their peers think, so they end up accepting the option they believe the group would choose, even if they disagree.
An example would be: Karla is on the bus, and a person sits next to her, she watches the woman and thinks that looks like a kind person and would like to talk with her for a while, but nobody talks with other people on the bus so avoid talking to her.
The spectator effect is an example of pluralistic ignorance; when an emergency occurs, the larger the group that observed the emergency situation, the less likely someone will help. The individual in the group may think that it would not be right to help, or that he/she should not help because surely another person would help.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
I think that the answer would be A because it doesn’t say anything about the president or justices/judicial court. Hope this helps!
<span>Cesar Chavez by reading excerpts from "lessons of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr." wanted people to make a change in the society for the upliftment and betterment of farm workers so that they can have better living, better health facilities, better financial help from government and their civil rights be protected. Cesar Chavez was aware of the hardships faced by farm workers so he wanted a change in the society to improve treatment facilities, better pay and better working conditions for farm workers.</span>
The answer to your question is True. The supreme court can rule certain laws unconstitutional through cases.
