Answer: Arthur was a very rare sort of person; quiet, yet caring, misunderstood like most people can be, but how many are caring enough to keep watch over 2 small children, and put himself in mortal danger in order to do whatever was necessary to protect these 2 children from a hate filled drunkard who one could see had badly beaten his own child? Who is so kind to offer up his own life to save others and not only did not seek praise or reward, but shun it? This is an exceptional person. He saves the children, puts himself in a very possibly bad legal position, but it was the right thing to do.
So many people would have never been on the spot, not taken a chance, nor fought a likely drunken man holding a large knife, a strong man made so by working manual labor, and at the end - taken “doing the right thing” as his desired reward.
Explanation:
Technology also has everything in between microchips , input methods and operating systems.
Answer:
I left you sitting there confused and wondering what you were going to say.
Answer: APOTHECARY: My poverty, but not my will, consents.
In this excerpt, we see an apothecary (the equivalent of a pharmacist nowadays) and Romeo. Romeo wants to buy poison, while the apothecary refuses to sell it to him because it is illegal. However, Romeo can tell the man is very poor. He is thin, looks hungry and is obviously in need. Romeo tells him to ignore the law, because he could use the benefit of the money he is willing to pay. The apothecary sells him the poison, but tells him that he does so unwillingly, because of his poverty. The conflict is between two factors that are important to him: on the one hand, his values tell him that it is wrong to break the law, and on the other, his poverty forces him to break it anyway.
