1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andrew [12]
2 years ago
12

Suppose that the U.S. government decides to charge beer producers a tax. Before the tax, 40 billion cases of beer were sold ever

y year at a price of $7 per case. After the tax, 34 billion cases of beer are sold every year; consumers pay $8 per case, and producers receive $4 per case (after paying the tax), and producers receive $5 per case. The amount of the tax on a case of beer is $1 per case. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $ per case, and the burden that falls on producers is $ per case.
True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been the same as if the tax had been levied on producers. True False
Business
1 answer:
OLEGan [10]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

$4

$1

$3

False

Explanation:

Tax is a compulsory sum levied by the government or an agency of the government on goods and services.

Taxes increases the price of products

Total amount of tax = new price of a case of beer - amount producers receive

$8 - $4 = $4

Burden of tax on consumers = new price of a case of beer - initial price

$8 - $7 = $1

Burden of tax on producers = Total amount of tax - Burden of tax on consumers

$4 - $1 = $3

the statement is false because if the tax has been imposed on producers, producers would not be able to share the burden of the tax with consumers. Thus, the whole burden of tax would have been borne by producers and the effect would be higher

You might be interested in
Career question #35 easy
Ganezh [65]
It is c because ruir
7 0
2 years ago
Charisma, Inc., has debt outstanding with a face value of $6 million. The value of the firm if it were entirely financed by equi
Gnesinka [82]

Answer:

$660,000

Explanation:

According to M & M proportion I with taxes, the value of the levered firm is:

V (Firm) = V (Equity) + V (Debt)

             = $28,400,000 + 0.25(6,000,000)

             = $28,400,000 + $1,500,000

             = $29,900,000

Total market value of the firm:

= Market value of the debt + Market value of equity

= $6,000,000 + stock outstanding × Selling price per share

= $6,000,000 + 415,000 × $56 per share

= $29,240,000

With non-marketed claims, such as bankruptcy costs, we would expect the two values to be the same.

The differences are the non-marketed claims:

Expected bankruptcy costs = $29,900,000 - $29,240,000

                                              = $660,000

4 0
3 years ago
Sara shouppe has invested $100,000 in an account at her local bank. the bank will pay her a constant amount each year for 6 year
katovenus [111]
We can compute this using the Annual depreciation charge
Use the formula:
depreciationcharge= (Co-Cn)i/[(1+i)^n-1)]
where
Co= initial amount= $100,000
Cn- value after n years= $0
n= life of account= 6
i= interest rate=10%
Sunstituting all the values, we will get,
depreciation charge = $12960.74

The bank will have to pay Sara shouppe  $12960.74 for the investment of $100000 with 10% interest.


5 0
3 years ago
Problems with (or leakages from) the money creation process would include an increase in the reserve requirement. unwillingness
mart [117]

Answer:

The correct answer is unwillingness of borrowers to obtain loans from banks to invest in factories or expansion of the firm.

Explanation:

Solution

<em>Given that:</em>

Leakage problem occurs or happens within an economy when the money goes out of the economy, which leads to a loss in the economic value of goods and services, and also leads to loss in profits making.

This would lead to an unwillingness of borrower's to obtain loans from banks in the expansion of the firm or to invest in factories.

4 0
2 years ago
1. Suppose that 10 years ago you bought a home for $150,000, paying 10% as a down payment, and financing the rest at 8% interest
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

1. Down payment = $15,000

2. The existing mortgage (loan) was for $135,000

3. The current monthly payment on the existing mortgage is $990.58

4. The total interest over the life of the existing loan = $221,609.58

6. The amount of the original loan paid off is $22,319.

7. Total amount paid to the loan company over the last 10 years is $258,928.58 ($243,928.58 + $15,000)

8. Total interest paid over the last 10 years is $221,609.58

9. The equity in the home is $67,319 ($180,000 - $112,681)

10. The new monthly payments will be $675.58

11. Saving each month because of the lower monthly payment is $315 ($990.58 - $675.58)

12. Total Interest = $352,137.21 ($221,609.58 + $130,527.63)

13. It does not make sense to refinance because what is saved per month cannot compare with the additional interest expense to be incurred for prolonging the payments.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

1. Cost of a home = $150,000

10% down payment = $15,000

Existing Mortgage = $135,000 ($150,000 - $15,000)

Home Price  150000

 Down Payment  10 %

Loan Term  30  years

Interest Rate  8%

House Price $150,000.00

Loan Amount $135,000.00

Down Payment $15,000.00

Total of 360 (30 years * 12)

Mortgage Payments $356,609.58

Total Interest $221,609.58

Ten years after, the loan balance has been reduced by $22,319 ($135,000 - $112,682)

Refinancing calculations:

Home Price  112681

 Down Payment  0 %

Loan Term  30  years

Interest Rate  6

   

Monthly Pay:   $675.58 Monthly

Total Mortgage Payment $243,208.63

Total Out-of-Pocket $243,208.63

Total of 360 Mortgage Payments $243,208.63

Total Interest $130,527.63

 

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In january 2010 a gallup poll asked a random sample of adults, "in general, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the way thing
    9·1 answer
  • The economic entity assumption requires that the activities of an entity be kept separate and distinct from the activities of it
    11·1 answer
  • A good example of central planning at work in the U.S. would be: Select one:
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following accounts would not be included in the Acquisition and Payment for Long-Lived Assets Cycle? a. Revenue. b.
    13·1 answer
  • Please help me, the picture is linked..
    15·1 answer
  • Quality improvement, relevant costs, relevant revenues. SpeedPrint manufactures and sells 18,000 high-technology printing presse
    5·1 answer
  • Metcalf Company leases a machine from Vollmer Corp. under an agreement which meets the criteria to be a finance lease for Metcal
    7·1 answer
  • What is one way to set up an opportunity for job shadowing?Contact people you know and request a shadowing experience.Show up on
    8·1 answer
  • Consumer A and Consumer B live in the same state where a sales taxes increase of 1% on all items has been enacted Consumer A has
    6·2 answers
  • What is a creditor legally required to do if you dispute a debt?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!