1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nimfa-mama [501]
3 years ago
10

Helpppp pleaseeeeeeeeeee

History
2 answers:
AlekseyPX3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

tar and feather I think

adell [148]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:5 should be B and 6 should be D

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Was the Aztec a democracy(vote for leaders)
Travka [436]
The Aztecs were most similar to a monarchy/dictatorship. they called their leader the “Huey Tlatoani” who was the ruler of the land.
3 0
3 years ago
Were the terms set forth in the treaty of Versailles justified? Was the treatment Germany received too harsh?
Ira Lisetskai [31]
The terms set forth in the Treaty of Versailles were not justified nor thought through, as they led to the harsh punishment of the losing side, which encourages revenge and the like. This is why the terms that Germany received were too harsh. The harsh treatment of Germany could lead to them seeking revenge on the winning countries, which would start another massive-scale war.
3 0
4 years ago
Which of the following is true about the Quran
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

I think the answer would be D

Explanation:

Hope this helps (and that it is correct :)

If it's wrong I'm really really sorry!!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was Charles Schenck arrested? What did he do that was illegal?
Daniel [21]
Charles  Schnenck  was arrested  for his antiwar activities during World War One.  He opposed the war because it would only led to mass suffering and death and will only benefit the rich who stand to profit from the war.  He was arrested under the Espionage Act on the grounds that during times of war, limiting the freedom of speech was justified.
(:D)
5 0
3 years ago
How are the English Bill of Rights and the Magna Carta similar? (1 point) Both worked to render the king powerless. Both were co
zepelin [54]

Answer:

Both limited the king's power and gave power to citizens.

Explanation:

  • Both of these are government power limits. The second commonality is that they are both written agreements that describe what governments can and cannot do.
  • Both the Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights are historically important documents; While Magna Carta was intended to act as a peace treaty between the troubled barons and King John
  • The English Bill of Rights ensured that the monarchy in England did not have too much accumulated power and thus empowered Parliament.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do oral stories contribute to history
    12·1 answer
  • Who was sentenced to jail in 1894 for helping to impede US mail delivery?
    6·2 answers
  • Who shot andrew jackson
    8·2 answers
  • How did the growth of big business change public attitudes toward business regulation
    10·1 answer
  • How did the French and Indian War lead to American independence? It helped colonists to take over the fur trade, which gave them
    11·2 answers
  • Brazil’s road to independence was different from that of its Latin American neighbors in that
    8·1 answer
  • What was important about Constantinople’s location?<br>​
    10·1 answer
  • What did the U.S. and Britain promise in the Atlantic Charter?
    8·2 answers
  • How did the geography of the Arabian Peninsula shape the way civilizations developed there?
    14·1 answer
  • Damdamin ni haring linceo
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!