1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Helga [31]
2 years ago
9

Why was the Union victory at the Battle of Vicksburg considered a significant battle of the Civil War?

History
1 answer:
gregori [183]2 years ago
8 0

Answer: Hello! Here your answer.....

The Siege of Vicksburg was a great victory for the Union. It gave control of the Mississippi River to the Union. Around the same time, the Confederate army under General Robert E. Lee was defeated at the Battle of Gettysburg. These two victories marked the major turning point of the Civil War in favor of the Union.

Hope this helps! (brainly)♥

You might be interested in
The _____ society did not have a centralized government.
Liula [17]
The type of society which didn't have a centralized government was called a Pastoral society. So that is your correct answer.

All the other civilizations/societies - the Egyptian one, the Mycenaeans, and the Indus valley civilization - had governments which were centralized and not dispersed to different locations. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A most extreme example of prejudice and racism in the United States in the 19th century was
Troyanec [42]

temival ofnatives frin their land's over 16000 were forced off

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
a presidential candidate gives a televised speech about his support for the military while in front of an army base. this politi
Art [367]
If I understand the question right, it would be showing bias in favor of the military, because of his location and the fact that he's talking about being supportive about the military.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who believed political parties were unavoidable?
Romashka [77]
I think it was the founding fathers 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a paragraph, explain why President Wilson encountered opposition in the U.S. Senate in his efforts to ratify the Treaty of Ve
sergey [27]

Answer:

On the side of Wilson, that is, for the adoption of the Treaty of Versailles and the ensuing entry into the League of Nations in order to continue direct intervention in European affairs, a significant part of both the ruling circles and the "public" spoke. Wilson's position was supported by prominent business leaders. The defense of the Treaty of Versailles focused on proving the United States’s worth of creating the League of Nations. With the help of the league and the Versailles Treaty, senators Hitchcock, Kellogg, Owen and others said that the United States will be able to rebuild Europe, sell its goods widely, which will improve the country's economic prospects for many years to come. The mandate system will open access to the colonies, to the Turkish Straits, to Middle East oil and other raw materials.

But the central argument of supporters of the Versailles system remained the argument that through the League of Nations the United States will be able to gain the position of the dominant power in the world. Senator Owen argued during the discussions that the League of Nations has a whole arsenal of means - diplomatic pressure, arbitration, and the International Court of Justice, boycott, blockade, the use of collective armed forces - and with their help the fate of any international dispute can be decided. Wilson’s supporters said the US’s joining the league will help “overcome social unrest in Europe,” stop the growth of socialist forces.

The opposition to the Wilsonists was called isolationist, although it itself did not recognize this name. The term "isolationism," despite all its conventions (in fact, it did not mean calling for the isolation of America), nevertheless had a constant content: the rejection of political and especially military alliances with Europe, 'bequeathed' by George Washington in 1796.

In the Senate, the first movement was a bloc of so-called “irreconcilable” (with a fluctuating number of 12 to 36 out of 96 senators), headed by William Bora, one of the most critical opposition leaders. Bora, Lafollett, Norris and other senators of this group 'attacked' the League of Nations as a tool for drawing the United States into alien wars, in defense of extraneous interests, and protested against anti-Soviet intervention.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why would the preamble include a list of beliefs?A to emotionally move the reader
    9·2 answers
  • Was is Johannes gutenberg famous for
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following events occurred last?
    12·2 answers
  • The change in status for women as they assisted the war effort at home was to play a role in helping them to be able to later on
    14·2 answers
  • Explain<br> how the geographic context of<br> Egypt affected the<br> development of Egypt?
    15·2 answers
  • What were the expectations of English colonists in America?
    10·2 answers
  • What is Ricky Martin's positive influences?
    10·1 answer
  • Which religion had particular influence in Southeast Asia beginning in the 11th century and still has a significant influence in
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these inspired reform movements such as temperance, abolition,
    12·1 answer
  • What international institution was created in 1946 to facilitate and reinforce the exchange rate system created in the aftermath
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!