In the 1760's, "country whigs" were Englishmen who <span>considered the British government to be corrupt and oppressive. They primarily rejected the idea of an absolute monarchy. They played a significant role in the political landscape as they continued to be critical of the British government. </span>
They were not ended so he didnt do anything
The correct answer is C) He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure.
Mexican citizens had conflicting views of Porfirio Diaz’s rule because he limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure
Porfirio Díaz (1830-1915) was the Mexican dictator that ruled the country from 1876 to 1911. He was a controversial figure in Mexican politics. On one side, he was an unyielding dictator and suppressed people's liberties, but on the other hand, he had the vision to modernize México and heavily invested in the construction of railroads to connect the country and to improve transportation and trade.
The other options of the question were A) He had a popular agenda of liberal reform but he did not institute policies that led to a lasting change. B) He led Mexico to military victories but he did not achieve great social and economic stability. C) He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure. D) He made strides in reducing the economic gap but he was a harsh and unyielding dictator.
The best option is A
<span>Migration from farms to cities
It is estimated that about eleven millions Americans moved from the farms from 1870s to 1920s which strained the cities housing and health systems a great deal. in addition, it is estimated than another 25 million arrivals of immigrants was recorded.
</span>
i remember putting in "both have high per capital income" but i don't know if I got that right